|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#41 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Slovenia
|
Quote:
__________________
too much is just enough |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Genova, Italy
|
hi trancy
Quote:
resistance (4.7k) will be in parallel with it. I think you have forgot the output cap. As depicted in your figure, the circuit will exhibit a non zero output voltage. give me some minutes to draw your cir Federico |
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Genova, Italy
|
Here is, trancy
You can try cir A or B. the first has a bypass capacitor as in your pic. gain is 15 (23.5 db) and Zout is about 3.5k. Cir B has no cap (that is degeneration). Its gain is smaller: 8 (18 db) but Zout is greater: 6.5k. Input cap may be avoided (If source has not DC component). As stated by Frank (ciao Frank) your amp has a very low Zin, and it does not seem very advisable to drive it with a common cathode stage. Ciao Federico |
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Unless you use a high gain triode and a step down output transformer in the plate.
Example: 6GK5, mu 78, rp of 5,900R. With Step down of say 12 to one, the gain will be about 6, which is 15.5dB, possibly enough, and Zout will be on the order of 41R, so driving 4K7 will be a snap. The B+ will be around 150V for best results; you should be easily able to cope with 1Vrms input, for 205Vpp at the plate and 17Vpp at the output of the trafo. This is a great way to drive low Z loads, though the transformer is expensive. Advantage; option of balanced output, no coupling cap, wonderful drive. Cheers, Hugh |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about direct coupling a anode follower into a cathode follower. | G | Tubes / Valves | 45 | 29th July 2004 06:47 PM |
| cathode follower | ackcheng | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 6th July 2004 03:12 PM |
| Cathode Follower? Yay or nay? | SHiFTY | Tubes / Valves | 25 | 16th March 2004 06:38 AM |
| cathode follower | olvrkrg | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 21st February 2004 09:49 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09372 seconds (71.37% PHP - 28.63% MySQL) with 11 queries |