SRPP & DACs - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 1st March 2004, 07:56 AM   #1
hacknet is offline hacknet  Singapore
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: sg
Default SRPP & DACs

i`m planning my TDA1543`s analogue stage and i`ve stumbled upon a couple of designs involving tubes.

i`ve seached around and can`t seem to find the reason why everyone`s output stage that uses tubes will be a 6922 in SRPP.

could a do a simple cathode follower?
  Reply With Quote
Old 1st March 2004, 09:36 PM   #2
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Hi,

Quote:
i`ve seached around and can`t seem to find the reason why everyone`s output stage that uses tubes will be a 6922 in SRPP.
First of all you want to do I/V conversion.
This requires a low value gridleak resistor so this demands a tube that can handle this without excessive distortion.

A quick glance at the curves of the ECC88 family will show you this is a good candidate for this kind of service.
Add to that it's medium gain and high transconductance and you see why this is indeed the prime candidate for this kind of application.

Now, why the SRPP?
Well, the ordinary CF having a bad rep for playing see-saw with the B+ and currents you'd want to look at an alternative.
Enter the SRPP with its improved linearity and lowish Zo and by the look of things it seems as if we've killed two birds with one stone....
Alas, looks can be deceiving: the SRPP is far from perfect, it requires a very good PS since it's PSRR is very low. It also works best into a predefined load, no problem for a DIYer who only has to cater for his own gear.
For a manufacturer however this solution is far from ideal.

Can it work O.K.?
Certainly can and it's often the better of a set of compromises, just not always.

Hope this helps,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
To SRPP or not? duderduderini Tubes / Valves 2 12th March 2007 03:01 PM
mu / srpp / or CF? AudioGeek Tubes / Valves 9 24th April 2004 05:48 PM
SRPP is....? peranders Tubes / Valves 8 19th December 2003 08:38 PM
Help with SRPP pre- ktigerb Tubes / Valves 11 10th October 2003 10:40 PM
Audio DACs, Instrumentation DACs. Brian Guralnick Digital Source 10 3rd November 2002 04:56 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:45 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2