Go Back   Home > Forums > >
Home Forums Rules Articles diyAudio Store Blogs Gallery Wiki Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Radiotron/Eli Duttman phono change C1 to .00391?
Radiotron/Eli Duttman phono change C1 to .00391?
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th October 2015, 12:36 AM   #1
lugnut is offline lugnut
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Austin TX
Default Radiotron/Eli Duttman phono change C1 to .00391?

What would changing C1 to .00391 do?

Click the image to open in full size.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 12:57 AM   #2
rayma is offline rayma  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by lugnut View Post
What would changing C1 to .00391 do?
That would affect the RIAA correction, probably reducing the higher frequencies by several dB for one thing.

Last edited by rayma; 11th October 2015 at 01:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 12:58 AM   #3
lugnut is offline lugnut
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Austin TX
I realize that, but how would the sonics be changed?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 01:03 AM   #4
rayma is offline rayma  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by lugnut View Post
I realize that, but how would the sonics be changed?
Similar to turning the treble tone control down part way.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 01:07 AM   #5
lugnut is offline lugnut
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Austin TX
Would changing R1 to 20K and C1 to .00391 restore the original top end performance?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 01:18 AM   #6
rayma is offline rayma  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by lugnut View Post
Would changing R1 to 20K and C1 to .00391 restore the original top end performance?
If you want to define C1 as 3.91 nF, the RIAA circuit can be redesigned, but all of the other parts in the RIAA will change their values.
Don't forget the source impedance of the first tube stage, which affects the value of R6.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 06:02 AM   #7
hego is offline hego  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tarraferma in Catalonia
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayma View Post
Similar to turning the treble tone control down part way.
Yes, C1 affects mainly at 75uS.

and remember... C4 = 3 x C1.

Cheers
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 10:32 AM   #8
Koonw is offline Koonw
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Radiotron/Eli Duttman phono change C1 to .00391?
I just finished the simulation of RCA photo with MOSFET buffer stage you attached and found few issues:

1) With zero cathode resistance on the 2nd triode, distortion is as high as 5%, min value I found is 5 ohms.

2) For output coupling cap of 0.1uF the output impedance below 100Hz is very high, 15K compared with less 1K above 1Khz. So I increase the value to 15uF and the output impedance is as low as 1K down to 10Hz.

3) 20 Meg bias resistor to compensate for bottom end? There is stability concern for current more 1mA. So I mod that too.

Here are some snapshots for sharing.
Attached Images
File Type: png rca-phono-12ax7-mod-1.png (275.0 KB, 233 views)
File Type: png rca-phono-12ax7-mod-2.png (242.9 KB, 227 views)
File Type: png rca-phono-12ax7-mod-3.png (214.9 KB, 225 views)
File Type: png rca-phono-12ax7-mod-4.png (298.3 KB, 225 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 02:43 PM   #9
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Radiotron/Eli Duttman phono change C1 to .00391?
Koonw the second stage uses grid leak bias, and most tube models I am aware of don't model grid current behavior correctly - why not build the thing as designed; I think you will find it performs quite a bit differently from your predictions.

That 0.1uF cap could be increased, but 15uF is way beyond reasonable, you don't really want to be amplifying the arm/cartridge compliance resonance any more than you have to. I'd say 0.47uF is at or beyond the point of diminishing returns.
__________________
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th October 2015, 02:56 PM   #10
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Radiotron/Eli Duttman phono change C1 to .00391?
Here's a purely mathematical way to implement an inverse RIAA in LTSpice using the LaPlace transform. (Convert behaviors specified in terms of time domain i.e poles at 3180us and 75us, and a zero at 318uS into frequency domain)
Attached Images
File Type: png laplace transform for Inverse RIAA.PNG (47.5 KB, 68 views)
__________________
"To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead." - Thomas Paine
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Radiotron/Eli Duttman phono change C1 to .00391?Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:50 AM.


Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Resources saved on this page: MySQL 15.00%
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2017 diyAudio
Wiki