Tube Mic preamp with compressor - any ideas? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 6th April 2015, 11:27 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Default Tube Mic preamp with compressor - any ideas?

Hi there, I'm interested in making a microphone tube preamp that also has a built in limiter/compressor so there's little difference between loud and quiet sounds. Designing and making a tube preamp that can drive a relatively low-impedance input such as a computer's line-in is easy enough, I can pretty much do that in my sleep.

Trouble is I want to add a compressor to the preamp, but the only schematics I can find either require a LOT of tubes or have a very high output impedance meaning that I cannot connect it to most of the stuff I have.

I tried one schematic for a compressor (the one that's on the very left), but again this is one of the ones that has a ridiculously high output impedance and I couldn't get it to work anyway, I thought I could connect it to the output of my preamp but like I said it was a no-go. Also I've attached a schematic of my preamp.

Another compressor I found uses a pentode with what appears to have the third grid "modulated" to adjust the gain. What about that? Would that work?

So can anyone direct me to a schematic that can amplify a microphone, uses standard tubes that most tube nuts like my self would have (such as the ECC83/12AX7), has a built in limiter and has a reasonably low-impedance output (100k or less)?

any help on that would be appreciated.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg OneTubeComp just the circuit.jpg (474.7 KB, 83 views)
File Type: png mic preamp.png (17.4 KB, 83 views)
File Type: gif Compressor.gif (3.7 KB, 80 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2015, 01:42 AM   #2
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Hint: The solution is just a cathode follower away...
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2015, 09:18 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
ruffrecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Holt, Norfolk
For the lowest tube count I would recommend using an opto resistor as the gain controlling element. There are plenty available with built in LEDs.

Here's a link to a two tube design:

http://www.ianbell.ukfsn.org/EzTubeM...L/PMTCLsc.jpeg

Cheers

Ian
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2015, 12:30 PM   #4
GoatGuy is offline GoatGuy  United States
diyAudio Member
 
GoatGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Quote:
Originally Posted by ruffrecords View Post
For the lowest tube count I would recommend using an opto resistor as the gain controlling element. There are plenty available with built in LEDs.

Here's a link to a two tube design:

http://www.ianbell.ukfsn.org/EzTubeM...L/PMTCLsc.jpeg
Nice diagram. Ambiguous penmanship! The cathode-bypass capacitor on the rightmost tube… is that 220 nF or 220 μF? could be that old 'μ' symbol, you know. … … granted which 95% of everyone have long given up using, but still.

GoatGuy
__________________
Five things matter in audio · LED underlit tubes, gold connectors bearing bright plastic ID bands, speaker cable thicker than your thumb, a hundred pounds of granite under the turntable, and those little spikey-things under the speakers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2015, 02:21 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
ruffrecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Holt, Norfolk
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoatGuy View Post
Nice diagram. Ambiguous penmanship! The cathode-bypass capacitor on the rightmost tube… is that 220 nF or 220 μF? could be that old 'μ' symbol, you know. … … granted which 95% of everyone have long given up using, but still.

GoatGuy
Ah, I see what you mean. You think my μ looks like a capital N - which would of course be quite wrong for nano-Farads.

Can't understand why engineers and electronics hobbyists would have given up using the μ for micro. Probably the advent of keyboards and business oriented software that made access to technical symbols such a chore.

Cheers

Ian
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to make mic input transformer 150:50KCT for mic tube preamp??? delipasha Tubes / Valves 9 3rd February 2012 05:54 AM
First tube mic preamp? Tympanic Analog Line Level 5 7th August 2010 04:13 PM
Mic compressor limiter fjpompeo Analog Line Level 0 1st June 2007 10:26 PM
'Tube' preamp bad for measurement mic? also Apex mic question morbo Multi-Way 10 23rd March 2005 10:19 AM
Tube mic preamp kimarin Tubes / Valves 5 23rd October 2004 09:30 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 09:57 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2015 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2015 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2