Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th April 2013, 07:51 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Default ECC83 differential preamp optimisation

Recently, I build an EL84 PP amp with a ECC83 differential amplifier as preamp with the following characteristics:

- Supply voltage (+V1): 300 V DC
- CCS: Cascode FET circuit
- Max output swing: 24 Vp-p

The end stage is coupled through a 0.1 mu caps and the input resistance of the end stage is approx. 300 - 1000 kOhm.

I have simulated and tested this circuit and it works nicely. I did have to adjust one of the two plate resistor values to match the bias current in the two amp halves.

My next step if to further investigate performance in detail (IMD, bandwidth, impact of plate load (due to end stage), etc).

I'm very interested to learn if people have experience with optimising such a preamp and if there are any ideas/suggestions how to further improve.

Thanks
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ECC83 diff preamp circ.jpg (36.6 KB, 367 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 08:46 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
I would restrict your bias adjustment to the cathode of the ECC83's. A 100R wire wound pot with the wiper to the CCS would do just the job. Also the resistance would help to stabalize the DC operating point (bias) of the circuit.
It seems that DC and AC balance are not the same and if you get the DC balance right the AC balance at the plates will probably be out. Only adjustment using a scope can get the AC balance right at the cost of DC imbalance. The reality is that this will drift over time so the adjustment would need to be at regular intervals.

In my experience such precautions are not really that important as the slight differences are reintegrated within the output stage and output transformer and it has very little effect on the sound of the amp between valve changes.

Shoog
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 08:55 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Zürich
I remember an experiment by SY using two very different tubes (like half ECC82 and half ECC83) in a differential/LTP stage, and given the plate resistors were matched, the AC balance was kept perfect, but of course DC not. Still I don't remember the details.
__________________
my surname is indeed 'de Best': neither misspelling nor snobbism! Ask SY!
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 09:07 AM   #4
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
Balance in CCS Long Tailed Pairs
__________________
"The way to deal with superstition is not to be polite to it, but to tackle it with all arms, and so rout it, cripple it, and make it forever infamous and ridiculous."- H. L. Mencken
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 09:17 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Zürich
Quote:
Originally Posted by SY View Post
how I dared to mention SY working with ECC82 Sorry!
__________________
my surname is indeed 'de Best': neither misspelling nor snobbism! Ask SY!
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 09:42 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
jazbo8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: In Transient
What parameters are you trying to optimize?
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 10:14 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
Quote:
Originally Posted by SY View Post
I didn't realize that they behaved quite this well AC wize - very impressive.

No special attention needed to match the valves or balance the DC then.

Shoog
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 12:06 PM   #8
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
DC balance issues in real life can come from triode matching.

DC balance issues in simulation (and real life) can come from grid current. The two grids see very different DC conditions: 1M and 100R in your circuit. The classic Mullard DC-coupled LTP has the same trouble, although there it is the second triode which has the high DC resistance on its grid.

The ECC83/12AX7 has only a narrow window between grid cutoff and grid current. This is because it is a high gain, high impedance valve. If the anode voltage drops too low then in order to maintain the required anode current (set by the tail) the grid voltage has to rise and can enter the grid current region. Bear in mind that simulator valve models might not do grid current particularly accurately - some omit it, others may err on the side of caution, and none can know exactly how much gas or exactly what chemical potential (?) your valve electrodes will have.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 01:15 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Hi all, thanks a lot for your input. I need some time to digest all, but please find my initial fb below.

@ Shoog: I assume the 100 R pot is used to increase the local feedback (similar as used for transistor diff amps). I'm aware that the amp is as good as it's weakest link, but I need to understand the details to know what the weakest link is ;-)

@ SY: Food for thought :-) As said before, need some time to study further

@ JazBo8: THD is quite good already, at the moment IMD and bandwidth has my focus. FYI: I'm not using global/overall fb

@ DF96: The DC conditions are different. I realise the 1M is actually 100 k due to the volume pot. Increasing the 100 R value reduces the high frequency range. Do you have any rules of thumb or formulas to manually check if this so called grid current region is entered?
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th April 2013, 01:31 PM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Shoog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
The wire wound pot offers the option to balance the DC bias points, but evidently there is little benefit to be gained by doing so.

Shoog
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Differential preamp wiring Gary Johnston Construction Tips 8 11th May 2012 06:58 PM
Preamp with single 12ax7 Ecc83 for stereo? Rodeodave Tubes / Valves 16 20th April 2012 06:11 AM
Replace ECC83 preamp valve with E88CC(6922) hillbear Tubes / Valves 23 11th July 2010 12:40 PM
Inductor optimisation program wakibaki Parts 1 28th August 2008 12:43 AM
RIAA phono preamp using single ECC83 DJG Tubes / Valves 19 29th March 2003 02:27 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:57 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2