|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Genova, Italy
|
I am considering building this very simple line pream.
It avoids input capacitor and rejects noise from supply well. What do you think about it? thanks Federico |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Florence
|
Sometime CD players have some bias at the output. If this approached the tube could burn. It' safe use a capacitor at the input.
At the output you just have 2 capacitors: the supply capacitors. You should use 2 fo good quality. By Aiace |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
You have you poor 6DJ8 floating in a 500VDC supply. It wasn't made for that high supply voltages. I also don't see a coupling cap on the output. You can build a CF that can do without it but for a linestage I'd rather use a cap for safety reasons. Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Genova, Italy
|
Excuse me Frank, I have not understood
I have a 250 V supply and the anode to catode voltage difference is about 125V with about 8/8.5 mA. Again, the circuit is not DC coupled. There are the two escape capacitors. Note that despite their value is 1 uF, they act as they are about 30 uF (mu times), and this is one of the reason to prefer this circuit ( as for me , obviously). grazie e ciao Federico |
|
|
|
#5 | ||||
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Ciao,
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I haven't seen anything like it before but it looks like this one: Maybe it's just me not understanding your circuit, in which case I apologise. Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
||||
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Scarborough
|
I also think that you have dc on the output, which is whatever voltage the valve pulls across the 14k resistor. You must place a cap at the node of this resistor the 300k and the 1 meg before the output if you wish to block dc.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Genova, Italy
|
No Paul,
I have not DC on the output due to the floating PSU. It floats in such a way to always provide 0 volts at the output irrespective of the input, as you can see in the attached image. Only the current across the tube will change. Best Federico |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Genova, Italy
|
No Frank,
the two circuits are different in various ways, for example the different position of the capacitors. Look at frequency response that follows. The –3db frequencies are very different, the ratio being about 18 that is mu/2. With this arrangement we can use smaller caps of high quality. Otherwise, with equal caps we have more extension at the low freqs. The point, however, is not the extension of the frequency response, but the output resistance behavior at low freq. as you can see. Ciao federico |
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
Have you actually built it? How about DC offset at the output? I usualy don't count on miracles if it's critical. Quote:
One circuit is DC coupled at first look but isn't really, the other isn't at all and you have 0.200µF working into slightly less than 50K. (1M//50K) Which goes some way to explain the roll-of in the bass department. Enlighten me because wherever I see differences and vice versa you seem not to. No offense, just trying to understand what I don't see. Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
||
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Genova, Italy
|
Hi Frank,
First of all I have to apologize for my bad knowledge of English language. There is no DC offset at the output if there is no grid current. That is, if the supply provides a voltage sufficiently high and the tube is properly biased there are no problems. However if one, for instance, uses batteries and works with a voltagesupply smaller than, say, 60 Volts, grid current is likely to appears since we have small polarization. In this case we have an offset at the output and we have to modify the circuit as reported. That is, we have to put a cap at the input. Again, with this last arrangement there is absolutely no DC offset at the output. (Automatically, no manually adjustment required) I am experimenting at low voltage (actually about 37V supply) with ECC88, E88CC, PCC88 but I had the best results with ECC86. Regarding the caps., I simply want to say that if I have at my disposal two 0.1uF caps I’ll use them in the proposed circuit rather than in a cathode follower because of the better performance, with particular reference to the output impedance. Bye Federico |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple Volume/Buffer! | amplifierguru | Solid State | 37 | 6th September 2010 06:41 PM |
| Simple Input Buffer | Adam M. | Chip Amps | 17 | 1st May 2010 12:37 AM |
| Simple Line level buffer/active crossover? | gregorx | Subwoofers | 37 | 28th July 2008 04:56 PM |
| Simple buffer for balanced inputs? | Nisbeth | Solid State | 6 | 25th October 2005 06:24 PM |
| What is better -> Buffer or simple pre | azamkita | Chip Amps | 11 | 17th March 2005 02:03 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |