|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#21 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
|
[QUOTE]Originally posted by andyjevans
[B]The one you refer to (dynaco Low Powered) has a 100R cathode R which is in common for both triodes and is decoupled with a 100µF cap.>> I see 100R between the cathode 1 and cathode 2, with cathode 2 taken to ground through the 100uF cap, so where's the bias resistor for the second section, and in any case wouldn't we expect round 1K? The DC bias path is via the 1K feedback resistor and the secondary winding of the output transformer to ground. Can you see it now? Later BZ
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow |
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
The DC bias path is via the 1K feedback resistor and the secondary winding of the output transformer to ground.
Can you see it now? Later BZ Hmmm. I've never seen this arrangement - I just assumed that the 1K was the feedback resistor. Haven't seen this anywhere else. Apropos the concertina in Dyna-based EL84 amp above, why 27k and 33k? I've only seen equal resistors in concertinas? What's the intention? Cheers, Andy |
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
The one you refer to (dynaco Low Powered) has a 100R cathode R which is in common for both triodes and is decoupled with a 100µF cap.>>
I see 100R between the cathode 1 and cathode 2, with cathode 2 taken to ground through the 100uF cap, so where's the bias resistor for the second section, and in any case wouldn't we expect round 1K? While we're on 'puzzled of UK' why does the concertina in the previous schematic have unequal resistors - first time I've seen that. What's the idea? |
|
|
|
|
#24 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Chicago area
|
Quote:
This type of feedback circuit is very common with equipment that is as old as I am. Back in the old days designers made an effort to get the most out of the circuit without adding more parts but by making what was there multitask a bit. Later BZ
__________________
What ever makes the tunes flow |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Singapore
|
Quote:
Just looking at some old threads By not using a seperate phase spliiter like the above example, will the power be lower that with? I seem to recall reading somewhere that it does, though I can't remember where or how... |
|
|
|
|
|
#26 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Adelaide South Oz
|
Yes the power will be less.
The EL84s are being run as a diff amp and so are their own phase splitter... err.!! that should be phase inverter. I have never tried this BUT I expect it to have a fair amount of 2nd harmonic distortion due to imbalance in the output stage. The reduced power is due to it being strictly Class A - Not sure what its clipping behaviouir would be like but don't expect it to be great. Cheers, Ian |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Simple EL84 amp... | Skorpio | Tubes / Valves | 11 | 3rd January 2009 08:25 PM |
| 12AT7 and the Simple EL84 | haziz | Tubes / Valves | 75 | 11th September 2007 10:32 PM |
| Yeo's Simple EL84 with a twist | sorenj07 | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 18th October 2006 09:48 PM |
| newb needs help on simple el84 amp PS | DJNUBZ | Tubes / Valves | 28 | 16th December 2005 05:47 PM |
| anyone tried the diy paradise simple el84 pp | RockysDad | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 11th April 2005 04:19 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08619 seconds (76.89% PHP - 23.11% MySQL) with 11 queries |