|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Hello
I was wondering if anyone could provide suggestions for an implementation of a local negative feedback from the anode/plate of the 805 tube back to the 300b driver stage? History: I removed the gnfb loop, and I ain't going back. I have way more resolution without it, but I would like to see if a local feedback from the power tube provides the decrease in impedance to tighten up bass and possibly extend freq. response without the same loss of resolution with a gnfb loop. (as per another discussion on this forum) Schematics for that section of the amp below. Also I can try provide any additional info if need be. Last edited by scutterflux; 11th January 2013 at 08:19 PM. Reason: mistakedly wrote Cathode, I meant anode. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Two problems:
1. The driver is a cathode follower so already contains 100% local feedback within itself. You can't apply feedback directly from the output cathode to the driver grid, as that would be bootstrapping - a type of positive feedback. 2. Feedback taken from the output cathode will sense the output current, not voltage, so will raise, not lower, the output impedance. If the amp was designed with GNFB then removing it will raise distortion and output impedance and reduce bandwidth. The extra distortion may be what you hear as 'resolution', as our ears are easily fooled. An amp without GNFB needs to be designed for that purpose. Feedback cannot simply be added or removed at will. |
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
|
Quote:
I meant off the anode or plates, my mistake... that's where the phase is 180 degrees out. Quote:
Quote:
I had to remove the first gain stage to remove what was clearly distortion. GNFB decreases distortion, like 2nd order harmonics and increases odd order relatively. 2nd order harmonics is distortion, right? Well I've probably traded some ratio of higher odd in exchange for greater distortion of the 2nd order, it's a nice trade off I think, very musicaly pleasing even if THD is greater. So I could just try things until I get it just right, that's normally what I do. I just thought I'd ask for help for a good starting point. Thank You |
|||
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
100% NFB means gain=1, which is how a cathode follower works.
You could try adding feedback from the output anode to the CF grid. This would reduce output impedance, as you want, but it will also reduce input impedance which will load the previous stage and increase distortion there. Electronic design is always a matter of compromise. Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| NFB Clarification | cbj591 | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 17th July 2010 02:17 PM |
| Another no overall NFB amp | npnp | Solid State | 9 | 8th April 2010 09:12 PM |
| NFB, how to implement here? | disco | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 12th August 2009 09:06 PM |
| PLH with zero NFB | revintage | Pass Labs | 5 | 20th March 2009 05:39 AM |
| How much NFB around an opamp? | cuibono | Chip Amps | 4 | 19th August 2008 09:55 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |