|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: MADRID
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
I have some doubts about zero bias and cap coupling, I feel that some direct coupled topology would be better here since the output tube will draw quite some grid current.
Search for Bob Danielaks audio page, he has built something with SV811-10 if my memory serves. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: MADRID
|
Thanks, I know this page: http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/1965/projects.html
But he recomand the SV572-10 instead of the 811. With my speakers 94dB, do you think than 2*6 W is enough or it will be beter to have a least 2*10 W J-Y |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
Eric Barbour knows his stuff, so does Bob Danielak...often the curves of the tubes tell the story. Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: MADRID
|
I dontīt know what to thing, a lot of person in BELGIUM, I think you know the forum !!! told me than with 94 dB, I need at least 12-15 W for having a "realiste" sound.
Do you have a shema of a SE 15W with TK88 or SV572-10, I heard good comment on this tube. see you |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sweden (Mora)
|
Uhm, whatīs the big deal about efficiency and power, really?
I love the way my ~1W "Monkey" amp sounds with together with my ~87dB speakers |
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
If you want to read alot of crap that's the place to go... Quote:
Enter the SV572-10... I did a Google and found more info than I'd hoped for: SV572-10 Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
||
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: MADRID
|
Thanks,
No the forum is in french: http://ptsoundlab.jexiste.fr/forum I already read and see the pages, but thanks anyway. I cannot decide beetween KT88 SE 11W and the SV572-10 by E.Barbour. See you |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: NY
|
Quote:
The sv572 isn't really in the same category as the kt88. The mu=10 version relies on driving grid current to get much power out at low plate voltage, requiring a low impedance driver (direct or xformer coupled, preferrably). There is also a mu=3 version that is more like an 845, requiring high drive signal at high plate volts if you want to get the most out of it. that probably doesn't help you, though... |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Phoenix, AZ
|
I'm listening to "my" version of the Eric Barbour amp as I type. I love it! I've heard it next to some nice amps and I have never been embarrassed. I recently went with a 6DN7 front end in place of the 6EM7 (80K plate resister) and a quasi ultrapath cap for the input. I prefer it to the strict Barbour based circuit. By the way, I also prefer the SV811-10. It always seems a little more "ballsy" than the SV572-10. Better for electric blues. Not your fathers 300B or 2A3 based amp but very nice!
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| sv572-10 | oj | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 10th June 2007 08:44 PM |
| Sv572-3 Se | Hojvaelde | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 28th May 2005 02:14 PM |
| Svetlana Svetlana EL509-II: Please disregard all my statements about this tube! | Morgan L | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 30th January 2004 06:15 PM |
| FS Sv572-3 | dhaen | Swap Meet | 0 | 10th June 2002 11:38 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10159 seconds (80.19% PHP - 19.81% MySQL) with 10 queries |