6550C v. KT88 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th October 2012, 10:39 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
mr2racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Default 6550C v. KT88

Hey All,

I am curious to know impressions of these two tubes for sonic qualities? I converted my Dynaco Mark VI's to KT88's to get away from the hard to find 8417. But I'm not happy with the sound and wonder if 6550's would have been a better choice?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th October 2012, 10:56 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Zero Cool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: MN
or KT-120's
__________________
It's not about what you can BUY...It's about what you can BUILD!
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2012, 12:44 AM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
the_manta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Munich, Bavaria
Transconductance is a problem here:
8417: gm=23mA/V
KT88: gm=11.5mA/V

Why not use the EL509-2 made by SVETLANA ?
gm=18mA/V
Seems like a good choice and is available from new production.
http://www.jogis-roehrenbude.de/Roeh...L509-02_SV.pdf
Be aware of 300V max. screen voltage.
__________________
Терпенье и труд все перетрут
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2012, 01:15 AM   #4
ChrisA is offline ChrisA  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by mr2racer View Post
Hey All,

I am curious to know impressions of these two tubes for sonic qualities? I converted my Dynaco Mark VI's to KT88's to get away from the hard to find 8417. But I'm not happy with the sound and wonder if 6550's would have been a better choice?
So you made two changes at once, new tubes AND some "conversion". It is hard to know if the tubes really do sound different or if it is something else you changed. Maybe tell us what you did.

I agree it is better to have an amp that can use new production tubes
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th October 2012, 03:07 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
mr2racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
I also replaced the front end with a 12AU7-12AU7 LTP. I think this is more likely the problem. I've rebuilt the original Dynaco boards and found a matched pair of 7199's so that will be the next modification. I used Mundorff silver in oil coupling caps.

Another possibility is EL34. I recently built an 8b copy and really loved that midrange.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SED 6550C matched quad winslow Swap Meet 0 12th May 2012 03:53 AM
6550-6550A-6550B-6550C - What are exactly Differences ?? tiefbassuebertr Tubes / Valves 2 29th July 2011 02:52 PM
Vintage quad of Svetlana 6550C tubes. Test strong. mg16 Swap Meet 2 4th April 2011 03:06 AM
Outputtransformer to IGA 6550C ULPP Green77 Tubes / Valves 2 13th December 2008 04:11 PM
Where to buy powertube KT88 or 6550C ? Stewen Tubes / Valves 7 28th May 2003 12:12 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:11 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2