|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ΔΡΑΜΑ - North Greece
|
Hello
I ask your forgiveness for the new thread but no one replies me in the most important thing for me in the other thread. So the only solution I had was to open a new thread for a clear technical discussion. I built a SET amplifier without any feedback using the same circuit of “Glass House 300Bse” stereo amplifier designed by Andy Groves (Audio Note) on which the only modification I did was to convert it in monoblock. To this I simply added a second 300B in parallel with the single one of the original circuit and I converted the output transformer primary to 1.5ΚΩ/350mA. What interests me is if the performance of amplifier as is presented in the three FFT plots is acceptable for its class of design. In the first are presented all main parameters at 1Wrms/8Ω “Un – Weighted”, in the second the same but in full output power at 8Ω “A – Weighted” and in the third the frequency response (or bandwidth -3dB). No filters have been used in FFT analysis (e.g. number of Harmonics), the vertical (Y) scale is in dBV so you can make a direct estimation of harmonics level in real Volts (0dBV=1Vrms) and only the frequency response plot is expressed in dBr for a reference max amplitude at 0dB. In all plots the FFT smoothing window used was “Kaiser 6”. For the frequency response as stimulus used White Noise. Thank you for any comment positive or negative. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Holt, Norfolk
|
Looks fairly typical to me. Over 1% THD distortion at 1W, mostly second and third harmonics with the harmonics falling off nice and rapidly. When the power is raised by 10dB the THD rises by about the same amount but the higher harmonics are much more relatively prominent which is an indication of the onset of clipping.
Cheers Ian
__________________
Ian |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ΔΡΑΜΑ - North Greece
|
Quote:
Thank you again. Fotis |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
|
looks quite good, even too linear for a SET...
Congrats |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ΔΡΑΜΑ - North Greece
|
Thank you so much palmas for your kindness to look on the FFT plots and above all for your positive comments + congrats
![]() As a newbie in tubes, i feel a big relief after your confirmation - as well this of ruffrecords - that i have obtained a good result. Fotis |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 6c33 SET (my next project). Need some feedback | rvrazvan | Tubes / Valves | 52 | 20th July 2012 08:27 AM |
| Plate-Grid feedback: How to get better than DHT performance from cheaper tubes | SpreadSpectrum | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 4th February 2011 01:49 PM |
| DC off-set versus no negative feedback... | philmagnotta | Solid State | 21 | 22nd December 2010 04:57 AM |
| SET amp using Triode-FET complementary feedback pair ? | Bigun | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 7th September 2009 05:23 PM |
| Iron set for Paraglow (2A3) SET amplifier | Alain Favret | Swap Meet | 1 | 19th March 2004 06:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |