|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#81 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi,
I got the point with the lower cathode resistor. Could you link the datasheet you used? What I don't understand properly: I thougt, the drive resistor is determined by the wanted drive to the upper valve. Im my opinion, the 10K brings only 25% of drive, so modulation of the upper valve is poor. Or does the higher current improve the amplification factor of the valve, so that only 10 is needed??? Or does the voltage drop becomes unacceptable now with 47K? I always thought, the SRPP hast to low drive to the upper valve, because the cathode resistor is only determined by bias requirements, and upper valve modulation is a happy sideffect... I always thought, u-follower is more perfect push-pull then SRPP... And betafollower would be constant current anode load alike.... MHMMMM... |
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
The data I used was on a sheet of paper in a book, but I'm sure google can find a 12AX7/ECC83 datasheet for you or an RCA receiving valve handbook.
Raising the 'drive resistor' reduces the output impedance from the upper cathode. It raises the effective anode impedance of the active load - roughly mu times the resistor. As the ECC83 is happier with higher anode voltage we want to drop as little as possible. 10k gives us a 1M effective load for the lower valve. You could try going a little higher but there is a balance to be struck. The upper valve already has the same drive as the lower valve just from having the same cathode resistor. Mu-follower is not push-pull hardly at all. It is really a hybrid of active load and bootstrapped cathode follower. Only the SRPP is balanced, and only that when properly designed. There is a reasonable write-up on Merlin Blencowe's site: ValveWizard. The upper valve modulation in the SRPP is not 'a happy side effect' but the whole point of the circuit. |
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
ECC83 datasheet
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
|
This is the circuit I built on the eBay board that I purchased a few years ago. The 6DT8 is basically a 12AT7 without a center tapped filament. I did test this circuit as I built it and I feel the front end is biased in a more linear operating point than the original circuit that used a 12AU7 (in the directions and schematic that came with the board). I used a lower closed loop gain as well. I'm not using this preamp currently but it functioned fine for me.
__________________
Tom |
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Hi there.
I took a look at the characteristics of the 12AX7 as published by GE in December of 1961. These characteristics curves show that at 1mA plate current the mu of the 12AX7 is just about 100, essentially independent of operating conditions. When a device behaves that linearly, essentially no significant change in mu over a range of anode currents, the tube has to be the "cat's meow" as far as amplifier linearity is concerned. In other words, if you operate the 12AX7 as a resistance coupled voltage amplifier with a 210V power supply rail the near optimal operating point should be with a 70k resistor in the plate-lead, (essentially equal to 68k) and the bias of the 12Ax7 should be adjusted to 140V across the tube and 70V across the plate resistor, a little more than 1mA in the plate-circuit. Vacuum tubes are, in general, so well behaved and so linear, that it is nearly impossible to cobble together a circuit using a 12AX7, that has poor harmonic performance. Greetings: Hans J Weedon |
|
|
|
|
#86 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Lower valve cathode resistor is "local feedback", upper valve cathode resistor derives a drive signal. u-Follower:The additional resisor ca be used to "replace" the drive from the upper cathode resistor with a correct sized drive, so that upper an lower valve are driven in a symmetric manner. I the current set is couple with 1M, so drive is only done with the additional resistor of the u-Follower... (My explanation is no load condition-what is the case in the CAT1, because a cathodefollower added... So, getting to the point Hans showd: Looking at the u-curves of the added datasheet, it seems that 3mA could be a stable u Area. Hans said, 1mA gives a stable u... I can't see this. Please explain... |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi jonusgrumby, but:You are using the 1K instead of the 1M in the u-Follower. What is also strange: The cathode follower work resistor is very low valued. I think, this is bad for distortion figures...
|
|
|
|
|
#88 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
Quote:
Running an ECC83 at 3mA with low anode voltage means that the grid voltage is low and inside the grid current region. This adds distortion by loading the previous stage. ECC83 is a wonderful valve when used in the right circuit, but behaves badly in the wrong circuit. This may be why it is so unpopular with some people. Last edited by DF96; 17th February 2013 at 01:59 PM. Reason: typo |
||
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
|
Hi guys.
I may have been wrong in my understanding about the operation of the 12AX7 and optimal plate-current. The enclosed GE<PDF> data-sheet shows that the recommended load resistor in the recommended operating region is between 100k and 510k. But I do agree that 3mA is not good that is in the forward biased region of Grid#1. Looking at the curves for mu, though on page 4 I may have been mislead. Hans J Weedon. |
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
... and looking in the attached data, around 3k for the cathode resistor seems quite ok.
another point of trouble I may see here: A much higher voltage coule improve a lot: around 600V for the u-follower could be very nice... |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Convergent Audio Tech SL1 preamp | mobyd | Tubes / Valves | 3 | Yesterday 08:14 AM |
| Greetings and request for info on Cat SL1 preamp | somi electronic | Parts | 1 | 25th March 2011 09:01 PM |
| CAT SL1 SIGNATURE schematik phono | vog | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 25th October 2010 03:39 PM |
| CAT preamp | marknoir | Swap Meet | 1 | 24th January 2007 02:55 AM |
| A Noisey CAT SL1 Reference | hifiscratch | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 23rd February 2004 05:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |