|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
That is a nice front end. I am partial to the 6SJ7 as the VA. I think that front end would sound much better than the stock 12AX7 12bh7 of the 8417.
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern Illinois USA
|
Hello.
I know this is slightly off topic but as I do not often see QS 8417 questions asked.. Has anyone here mucked about to use sweep tubes in these? It seems a very good candidate for such a mod. Nice simple topology and should sound great, powerful, plus not require geek tweek fiddly stuff? Second question, what bias current are people setting when they convert to the ¨Super¨ 6BG6GA (7027 innards), 6L6 (6P3C) variants? I have just installed my last two matched Sylvania 8417´s. All four of my amps are modified to allow bias setting for the other tubes and I do have 4 matched quad sets of the 6BG6GA and the socket adapters.. But I have no idea what bias current to set. Thank you.
__________________
I think; therefore will NOT be Politically Correct. |
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
|
The Super 6BG6GA's can easily run 50mA bias each without a problem. I've run them in my modified 8417 mono blocks. Pull out the 8417's and put them on the shelf for another day.
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Northern Illinois USA
|
Thank you... I´ll give them a try.
__________________
I think; therefore will NOT be Politically Correct. |
|
|
|
#15 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2012
|
if you bias your amp,you have to matched the plate current of the two tube of each monoblock by at least 5% without exceeding the maximum allowable plate dissipation.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quicksilver 8417 conversion | Original Burnedfingers | Tubes / Valves | 25 | 18th December 2011 10:33 AM |
| Quicksilver 8417 question | john65b | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 24th October 2008 07:40 PM |
| Quicksilver 8417 power supply caps? | popeye4 | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 1st September 2005 10:10 AM |
| Quicksilver 8417 | dreaded 42 | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 4th September 2003 11:14 PM |
| Quicksilver 8417 model changes | Original Burnedfingers | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 12th April 2003 02:45 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |