Mullard 12AX7 part uniformity - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th April 2012, 08:21 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
trobbins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
Default Mullard 12AX7 part uniformity

Valves never cease to amaze me, for such a partly-handmade analog device made decades ago and long before Japanese five 9's quality processes.

I just tested 47 used 12AX7 from the same Feb 1957 batch (mC1 B7B) and within the approx 1-2% tolerance and repeatability of test conditions they all were effectively the same with respect to voltage gain and DC bias conditions (320VDC supply; 100k anode resistor; 1k8 cathode unbypassed). For DC bias, the spread in anode voltage was from 212V to 222V with only 8 triode sections just going beyond.

I can't verify their operating hours, but it is likely to be substantial as they were in a church organ (manufactured late 57 or 58), and all in the same type of circuit (tone generators) - of the 60 valves, thirteen were ring-ins, which may indicate the level of past failures.

Unfortunately the organ didn't come with a golden NOS sample to use for comparison
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 09:22 AM   #2
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Your spread in anode current is about 10%, which is at the better end of typical for a competent manufacturer. 20% is easily possible. Of course, it may be that they were selected if uniformity was a requirement for the circuit.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 01:38 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
trobbins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
The spread in the bulk of triode sections is within +/- 2.5%, with outliers within +/-4%, but that formally expands a bit with test process and circuit tolerances.

I doubt they were selected in any way - it was an English production line organ, and the circuitry is simple see-saw dividers plus tone oscillators. I expect the production was pretty mature by 1957 for the 12A-7 range after 8 or so years.

Do you have any feel for what parameters would be expected to change with use with respect to DC anode current changing in a fixed setup, and whether that change is as great as typical manufactured part variation?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2012, 05:30 PM   #4
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
I would guess that gm would roughly scale with anode current. Maybe the mC1 design had particularly tight parameters?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2012, 03:26 AM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
trobbins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
I found some time look at a few references.

Metson provides a summary of what appears to be the typical form of degradation (as opposed to failure):
"The decay of mutual conductance with time is probably the most serious of the electrical forms of failure. It is due to two separate and distinct causes—oxidation of excess barium in the cathode leading to emission failure, and growth of a high-resistance interface between matrix and core. The first cause is clearly the destruction
rate of barium by residual gas exceeding the production rate by the activators over a sufficient period of time. Symptoms of failure are a fall in mutual conductance and an increase in valve noise due to inadequate emission. The second cause is the formation of a layer of barium orthosilicate between matrix and core during valve manufacture - the chemical reaction will be clear from eqn. (2). When the valve enters service the layer is highly active owing to the presence of excess barium atoms and its resistance is normally less than an ohm. As the layer loses excess barium by gas action or diffusion to other parts of the matrix, its resistance rises and may reach 50 or even 150 ohms for a two-watt core. The negative-feedback action of this resistance results in substantial degradation of mutual conductance. These two actions are at present thought to account for most cases of mutual-conductance failure."
http://dalmura.com.au/projects/Valve...son%201955.pdf

Fig 4 of following link shows an example of the gradual reduction of transconductance with time.
http://dalmura.com.au/projects/Submarine%20cable.pdf

An older 1926 paper on life testing indicates in Fig.1(c) that testing at 0V gate bias may be a health indicator of emission degradation. Perhaps a suitable test would then be to use a pushbutton short across the cathode resistor and test for anode voltage. The resulting variation from anticipated 12AX7 datasheet 'average transfer characteristic' may be an indicator.
http://dalmura.com.au/projects/The%2...c%20valves.pdf

From my limited experience with valve tester methods - one test is to reduce heater voltage and check how gain changes. Maybe I'll set up to repeat tests on a sample of the 47 long-plates and check anode voltage (aka anode current) variation for filament voltage at 6.3V and 5.7V (original tests had nominal 6.6V heater level). I haven't come across any representative curves - but it appears to be that linear variation would be expected as normal, but an increasing drop in gain as heater voltage reduces would indicate more degradation of cathode.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2012, 09:05 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
trobbins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
The change of bias voltage required to maintain constant operational conditions, for changing heater voltage when cathode current is not limited by emission capability was discussed by Valley and Wallman in their 1948 Vacuum Tube Amplifiers section 11.6.

A fairly constant slope in bias voltage vs heater voltage occurs when emission capability is not a concern. So I'm guessing there would be a noticeable change in slope when emission does limit maintaining cathode current.
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2012, 10:48 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
trobbins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
From PRR's comments in link, it looks like a 12AX7 would have to be very very emission degraded to show up changes in normal circuit operating performance (circa 1-2mA cathode current) when lower heater voltage was reduced to even well below -10%.

Reduced Filament Voltage
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Pair of Mullard ECC83/12AX7 10M Master Series kico Swap Meet 0 16th February 2012 01:06 PM
FS: Mullard ECC83/12AX7 10M Master Series kico Swap Meet 0 8th February 2012 02:49 AM
FS: Mullard And Telefunken 12AX7 Zedguy Swap Meet 5 26th February 2008 01:34 AM
mullard 12ax7 draget Swap Meet 0 12th August 2005 08:27 AM
What Mullard 12AX7 is better? Tim Wyatt Tubes / Valves 3 12th October 2004 08:28 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:14 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2