|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#11 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
It has an effect on the sound and high frequency. I usually don't like it so I remove them. To each his own.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
Should you also be aware that measuring different characteristics may be capable of showing the effect of the modifications, rather than relying solely on the subjectivist view that only y/our ears can tell the difference?
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
I think you just need to accept that our ears are better measurement instruments than any man made device, for certain things. We have millions of years of evolution behind the design of our sensors. It's a matter of life and death, at times.
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It depends on how it's done. If the smaller cap is placed local to the signal circuit, it can prevent or reduce the likelihood of oscillation. This is particularly true with circuits using high gm RF tubes like ECC88. If the small cap simply goes across the large one several inches away, its effect is negligible-to-zero.
__________________
If there's a sucker born every minute, where do the rest of them come from? |
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
|
Quote:
Quote:
I would not advocate anyone taking my subjective opinion of this - I advocate them taking their own subjective opinion. As directdrive pointed out, he observed the difference, didn't like it and took them out - I can respect that position as much as my own. Its such a simple and quick thing to try that I cannot understand why anyone would lose any sleep over just sucking and seeing. Shoog Last edited by Shoog; 7th April 2012 at 03:46 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#16 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
|
It actually supports my belief that 9 times out of 10 when given a choice people will opt for a bandwidth limited amp for long term listening pleasure.
Shoog |
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palatiw, Pasig City
|
Quote:
but as a means to listening pleasure, yes it is very reliable, and yes it matters.....
__________________
http://www.elab.ph/forum/index.php?topic=32688.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
|
Shoog -perhaps you use large main filter caps with poor ESL, or place your bypass cap in a much better position? Large caps typically start rising in Z above 100kHz, and a 1uF film bypass is only going to get down to low Z above 1 Mhz - do you use a smaller electrolytic for the bypass? A bypass on the main filter cap can serve two masters - do you place yours for smaller loop area of the power supply, or the output signal stage?
Ciao, Tim |
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
|
I have generally used large computer grade caps (220-1000uf) and then bypassed them with something small such as a film cap of 1uf. Every situation is necessarily different. I add the film cap on the last electro in the power supply.
I also tend to bypass my cathode bypass electros (generally effective values of 500uf) with 10uf film caps. on the bypass cap, but again this depends a great5 deal on what is at hand. Shoog |
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palatiw, Pasig City
|
me too use those kind of caps in my tube amps, a capacitor bank per channel, capacitors shown are 470ufd/450volt ecaps.......this is a 4D32 pp amp i am building...a work in progress.....
__________________
http://www.elab.ph/forum/index.php?topic=32688.0 |
|
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| bypass caps for bypassing mylar caps? | crippledchicken | Multi-Way | 4 | 27th February 2008 04:24 AM |
| Just one big filter cap or more smaller filter caps ... | beppe61 | Power Supplies | 2 | 18th July 2006 05:46 PM |
| Bypassing bias stage with caps | EchoWars | Solid State | 5 | 21st November 2003 08:16 AM |
| smaller caps | punchpeanut | Chip Amps | 0 | 27th August 2003 01:59 PM |
| many smaller caps Vs big ones | Christian | Solid State | 12 | 2nd March 2002 03:20 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |