|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kenfield, CA, USA
|
Hi all,
The dilemma is this. I am trying to design a filter stage for a non oversampling DAC that outputs a lot of ultrasonic noise. I have evaluated a few options so far (passive filtering, problem: needs big inductors; active filtering, problem: opamp in signal path). Another potential option is using a bandwidth limited 1:1 signal transformer. The idea is that the natural behaviour of the transformer would filter off ultrasonic frequencies above the audio band. Any comments? Also how would one set about evaluating transformers for this purpose? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Near London. UK
|
The behaviour of transformers outside their pass-band is not something generally discussed in polite society as ultrasonic resonances abound. The inductors needed for passive filtering need not be large if the impedance is sufficiently low. Even at 75R terminating resistances, audio reconstruction filters are perfectly possible with air-cored inductors. If you were to drop to 10R, or less, you could terminate your (current output) DAC with the filter, follow it with an MC transformer, add a bit of low-noise gain with a 6C45, and buffer the output with a 6C45 cathode follower.
__________________
The loudspeaker: The only commercial Hi-Fi item where a disproportionate part of the budget isn't spent on the box. And the one where it would make a difference... |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Kenfield, CA, USA
|
Thanks for your reply. The issue is that I was going to put the filter right at the output of the dac, after I/V conversion (using a transistor circuit to boost current first) and directly before the amp. The filter would therefore be driving a 75k rather than 75r load. I think I will have to look into active filters, as using 600mh inductors is not sensible IMHO. Cheers!
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
|
Hi,
Quote:
Why not use a step-up xformer and do the I/V and de-emphasis at its input? Cheers,
__________________
Frank |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Transformer type Low pass filter | knivies | Digital Source | 3 | 18th April 2008 11:28 AM |
| need help wana change 60-Hz twin-T notch filter to 279 Hz filter | prorms | Solid State | 0 | 9th February 2008 11:38 PM |
| FOR SALE IN AUSTRALIA - Toroidal transformer + filter caps and rectifier | guitar_joe | Swap Meet | 0 | 5th May 2007 02:58 PM |
| transformer as 44kh sampling filter | audionut | Digital Source | 0 | 20th July 2006 11:21 AM |
| Is common mode filter core suitable for switching transformer? | Kenshin | Power Supplies | 9 | 24th May 2005 03:10 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |