|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Dear All. I have tried my best and tried to come up with a way to use some GU81M I have seen lying around and *may* go and secure for future projects.
It is my very first attempt to create something. I have replicated the first stage from Pmillet's (813 SE triode amp) and tried to implement the alternative method of strapping a pentode into a triode (diodes and bypass caps on the right) but pmillet used a resistor in his design so I guess it is the correct approach (also with te B+ envolved I'd rather keep everything simple) I tried to do my best. It is probably just full of mistakes and useless but if anyone wishes to suggest a complete design I'd be grateful! Alex |
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
2) why not use a real triode as the input? Maybe you just happen to have this tube on hand? Triodes have lower noise. 3) Are you using an electrolytic cap as a coupling cap? That will not work. use a non-polarized type cap. Any film cap will do fine. 4) best to connect the wiper of the bias pot to one end. A common failure mode of pots is that the wiper goes open circuit. Then quickly after that the tube fails. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
thanks ChrisA
1) NO. That was a stupid mistake. Obviously I need a source of +V and infact Pmillet's design has a +150v source and a 100ohm resistor in series. 2) Pmillet's original design had a 813 tube and required a suitable input tube to drive it. The characteristics I would be aiming for are: high gain, low impedance and (but can't tell by my own also...(and It helps these days) the 12HG7 is quite cheap! 3)The decoupling cap should be non polarized. Forgot to write it down. 4) Thanks! Will redesign that part for sure! However even If I get things going I am still stuck with finding adequate transformers. SE transformers of 100+w need to be custom made I guess. I really don't know where to look. I'd rather have them made by someone I can trust and have a direct contact with. Would the design work once the mistakes are corrected? Do I need to ground the center tap between filaments? Does the quality of the coupling cap have a really impact on the design? What would be a good choice? Sorry for the dumb questions. Alex Last edited by Alexontherocks; 21st December 2011 at 08:09 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
At first look i figured the gu81 was just a normal Russian beam tetrode like am EL34 or K66. But no, the thing is huge. Not at all the reasonable choice for a first time build. One other problem. What is the input impedence of the power section? You have a 22K resister to ground on the grid. So the input is no higher than 22k. And what happens as you adjust the pot? At any setting other than full left it is less than 22k Can your driver tube drive such a low impedance? I doubt it. How will you build a power supply for this? What is the bias current in this tube. I'm guessing maybe 0.1 amp. There are no caps rated this high. You will need a huge series/parallel network and many equalization resisters. Can you afford to have an output transformer designed and built. This will be in the "several hundred dollar" range and it will be truly huge in size and weight I would not ground a filament. Best I think to elevate the entire heater loop. Make a virtual center tap and connect that to ground or to something above ground to elevate the loop. There are people who will argue that only special ultra expensive coupling caps are any good. But, I think a more main stream opinion is that you will be fine as long as you don't use something really bad, like an electrolytic cap. Even if you do want the $100 cap, build the amp first with a normal $1 film cap. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks ChrisA for your comment!
I have actually built several amps (mostly solid state) both in class A and AB. The last project is a 6 channel amplifier. Tube world is different I know. To date I have built Pete's engineer's amp and small amps based on kt88 hence an interest in the new kt120s which caught my eye just like the GU81Ms Some time ago I helped a friend build a teslacoil (incidentally that was the first experience with a vacuum tube) and even though I took no part in the design I did work with the thing for quite some time..building and testing all the power section. I have tinkered with microwabe transformers, EAT transformers from old tv sets...always followed every safety procedure I could think of. I am a newbie but this is not my first build. To answer some of your questions to the best of my abilities: 1. To cover the B+ I will be probably go for several 4,700uf caps in series and resistors whith a secondary of 860v more or less. The remaining voltages will be derived from a common 380v secondary on the transformer. Filament voltage and relay control will be separate. 2. To answer some other points, a solution might be to insert an inline transformer (sorry if the term is not correct in english) between the driver section and the GU81M. A 1:2 or 1:3 transformer maybe? This is just my first attempt at designing. If you were to design a schematic I would probably be able to build it. Cost is a relative issue. I am willing to spend the necessary money. 100w - 150w is however my ultimate goal. Alex |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
to put it in other terms:....
If someone else designs, I gladly build SE or P-P or even PPP |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
But this still is a fun design. I'm wondering about the output transformer. It is going to be huge. can such a large transformer still sound good on the high end? From my reading this depends mostly on the interleave plan and other details of the physical construction. Can anyone get this right on the first try? I don't know but I'd plan on a prototype or two. They call these things "tube amps". I don't know why. Tubes are only a minor component. They should be called "transformer amps" because by far, the transformers are the largest, heaviest, most costly and the most critical to sound quality. The tubes are second place. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I certainly do!
However rest assured I do take all precautions I can when working with such equipment. In my previous builds I have always used policarbonate to create layers, cages and /or sections to isolate various parts of the amp. In cramped spaces this works well. Plus you can find polycarbonate o similar products in most DIY stores. Easy to cut and to form with a small propane torch. Anyways...back on topic. Given adequate isolation and build characteristics, P-P transformers would be a better choice. It is not an impossible mission to find a 100w range P-P 5k transformer at a reasonable price. To find one with adequate isolation is another matter. I have no theroetical basis to design an amp. I am just trying my best to learn so if some kind sould were to propose a P-P design based on the GU81M I would be grateful. Alex |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
|
hey-Hey!!!,
I once thought to build with this tube...even got the tubes and sockets. What looked best before I came to my senses was a Class A PP design. U-L rigged; 20% tap location on. 800V supply, 400 mA idle per tube and a 3500 Ohm a-a output trans( to be capable of 200W full bandwidth ). OPT needed to be huge even then...I have since been playing with much smaller designs... cheers, Douglas
__________________
the Tnuctipun will return |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Bandersnatch...
Your input is appreciated. I saw the Hammond 1650 series with OPT up to 280W RMS (12kg!!). Looking for something smaller one could opt for the 100w 5K PP OPT. Or Have them done (minimum 500$ expense) but may be worth it. I guess one could reasonably look for a 5K - 3.5K OPT rated at 200W RMS Big, sure, but mechanically doable. I am really looking for info on a feasable design. Would a single driver stage work? is an interstage trafo absolutely necessary to couple the driver to the output section? I really like a minimalist approach. All seems just so elegant. The power section is not excessively complex, expensive, but not too complex. By separating the filament heater trasnformer form the rest I may also cut down on the main transformer cost. I really like the tubes. I have a photograph of them on my cellphone and they are just beautiful. I will post a schematic later, maybe this time it will be better. Alex |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Very simple SE Triode Help | ambience exists | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 24th July 2008 10:51 PM |
| Best driver for KT88 Triode SE. | Kenneth Zhu | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 20th January 2008 05:19 AM |
| pentode in triode mode SE vs a DHT SE like 2a3/300b | jarthel | Tubes / Valves | 49 | 30th April 2007 12:25 AM |
| gu81m | ik3ssj | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 4th March 2007 03:41 PM |
| SE Triode amp for a newbie | tta60 | Tubes / Valves | 24 | 15th May 2006 03:13 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.13163 seconds (89.66% PHP - 10.34% MySQL) with 11 queries |