|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm sure this has been done before, but does it look feasible?
Scott |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
It is feasible in the sense that it will amplify audio signals. Possibly sub-optimal in the sense that a simple active load for the first triode would probably work just as well.
Driving an EL34 ultralinear output could require the phase splitter to use a significant part of its characteristic, so some distortion could occur here. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
not that I know much about it
but when using the low side out output of the mu-follower, which is high impedance, is there something about loosing gain, when 'receiver' load is less than in the mega ohm range 'upper' output on mu-follower is of very low impedance, and thus not a problem but high impedance low side might be used fore DC coupling why that is I dont know
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Sorry, my mistake. Yes it is just an active load, not a mu follower. I should have ignored the thread title.
The 12AT7 will see an anode load of about 1M so it will be as linear as a 12AT7 can be. |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by scott17; 17th December 2011 at 03:41 PM. Reason: not too high |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: Nov 2005
|
how do calculate/choose the right phase splitter tube, to ensure good balance between anode and cathode ?
(honestly I dont understand why theres not more gain from upper anode side, but apparently both sides are unity gain) I understand that the limited drive of cathodyne phase splitter can be ok with easier driven tubes like el84 but EL34 can be a bit more tough to drive, or ? also, cathodyne phase splitter might be more easily 'overdriven', from what I have read considering the very high gain of mu-follower, would this cause 'issues' ? |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
There may very well be too much gain in the mu-follower. It is direct coupled through a voltage divider to match the calculated grid bias of the phase splitter. The 6N1P is pretty much pushed to the limit in this case, and may not (probably won't) drive the EL34s very well at all. Another stage could be added. But this is an experiment. Here is a good article by Albert Preisman: http://www.aikenamps.com/cathodyne.pdf |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
|
If you are going to use a 6N23P, why not use both stages for the Mu Stage as it is designed for Cascode operation per the data sheet.
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Quote:
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mu Follower to drive a Push-Pull Amplifier? | Kashmire | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 26th October 2011 09:49 AM |
| Commercial Audio Brands: N-Ch/NPN only output devices in a push pull power follower | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 0 | 11th May 2011 10:15 AM |
| Cathode follower amplifier, push-pull, xformer-coupled | 00940 | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 19th November 2010 01:53 PM |
| Push-Pull driver stage? | alexmoose | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 18th September 2006 11:38 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |