|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
After having succesfully built SY's RDL I am hungry for more.
I am planning to design and build a push-pull amp with 6C4C DHT triodes. Some reqs / limitations 1. Tubes easily available 2. Dual mono approach 3. Use of 2 PSU transformers. each 2 x 320V 0.1A, 6.3V 2A, 12,6V 1A 4. 12 W output push-pull 5. 6C4C to be easily replaced with 6L6 (6p3s-e) 6. Silicon devices allowed: LEDs, FETs or BJTs. 7. CCS for heaters 8. Regulated voltage for a voltage amp and a phase splitter 9. LED biased output tubes 10. Size of a chassis |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I think of some tubes I own to be used:
- voltage amp Phillips Miniwatt ECC81 and E80CC, Tesla E88CC, Russian 6H9C, Siemens C3g - phase splitter Edicron E182CC, Russian: 6C45, 6C4, 6H8C However, PT has 12,6V winding which limits the use to smoe of the above. I feel E80CC as a voltage and E182CC as an LTP is a starting point. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
As an OPT vintage Polish TGp-12-26-666 will be used:
Rp-p = 7k @ Ro = 15k. n1 = 3200, n2 = 140 L = min. 90H P = 12VA It was designed for an EL84 push pull amp. If used with 8 ohm load it is approx. Rp-p = 3,7 kohm. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vinnytsja
|
6C4C have Ri = 800 ohms, and Rp-p = 3,7 kOhm is enough for it. For your PSU transformers Rp-p=5 - 6 kOhm would be better with a self-bias. With fixed bias I would do Rp-p=6 - 7 kOhm. Power output will decrease slightly, but the distortion will be much less.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks SVStube for a piece of advice. I have those transformers at hand. Meanwhile I will have custom ones made.
As for the operation point: Ua = 320V Ug-c = -65V (LED) self bias Ia=40 mA then Ub = Ua + |Ug-c| + Uw1 = 320V + 65V + 370 ohm * 40 mA = 399,8 V |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have a bunch of these tubes so I'll be watching your development !
I've listened to a SE fixed bias 6C4C driven via an interstage trafo and it sounds good. Main complaint is hum, but with PP you can wire the two heaters in anti-phase.
__________________
"The test of the machine is the satisfaction it gives you. There isn't any other test. If the machine produces tranquility it's right. If it disturbs you it's wrong until either the machine or your mind is changed." Robert M Pirsig. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Vinnytsja
|
You need to rectify out the heat winding and hum away. Or you can make the heat winding of the 2 halves and include balancing potentiometer of small nominal among them.
Last edited by SVStube; 29th November 2011 at 01:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
|
hey-Hey!!!,
The last few DH PP amps I build with 1 heater trans for each tube, and one hum pot across it for each tube. 2.5V to 12V to heat( 1619, HY69, 4E27, 813, HY1269 ) and no hum at all. Don't go to trouble to rectify DC for DH PP. Watch dissipation in hum pot. cheers, Douglas
__________________
the Tnuctipun will return |
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Effects of AC Heating Power Applied to Directly Heated Triodes |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Now, I need to choose proper HT PSU for output tubes. I am not certain what is current requirements while voltage at grid changes from 0 to max.
Assume ug = 0 (or Ug = -65V), then Ib = 2x 40 mA and Ub = 400V. When Ug1=0V and Ug2 = -130V, then Ib = 75 mA + 0 mA, because one triode does not conduct? Shortly, can I use a current source of 80mA as a model for a load to PSU? Why is it important? One reason is choke impedance in series with the load, the more current, the more voltage drop. Last edited by yagoolar; 29th November 2011 at 03:48 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| "Push-Pull" for push und "Push-Pull" for pull (like Gamnut) - whats the right name? | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 68 | 26th December 2011 07:17 PM |
| Push-Pull vs Push-Pull-Parallel | rsumperl | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 13th July 2010 10:10 PM |
| modify parallel push-pull EL84 to single push-pull | chungtat | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 3rd November 2005 11:25 PM |
| Push Pull | bellx | Solid State | 3 | 25th January 2004 10:59 AM |
| Double push-pull versus single push-pull | jraraujo | Tubes / Valves | 19 | 19th October 2002 12:23 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.16154 seconds (59.49% PHP - 40.51% MySQL) with 11 queries |