|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Hopefully a quick question. With a long tail pair, 12AX7, 82k plate resistors, 620 ohm cathode, 33k tail, would there be much effect by having the 620 ohms capacitor bypassed?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
More gain, but you'll need very large bypasses if you want to extend that gain into the bass.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
22uF, are we talking about the same gain increase as you would get in a single stage? I do not recall seeing it used before, not that I get around all that much.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Hate to second guess the only reply I got but I thought about this a bit more and am a little confused. I should have thought more on it earlier rather just before I wire up the circuit but better late than never.
Thinking this through I get the feeling that if I put a capacitor on the cathode resistor in a Long Tailed Pair inverter I would not get any signal in the second triode. I see the LTP as a self-split output stage that needs a ac voltage developed across the cathode resistor in order for the second triode to have a signal to amplify. By using a bypass capacitor the gain on the first triode is increased but the second triode grid and cathode is at the same potential as each other and you would not get any signal on the plate. If someone can ease my mind over this I would appreciate it. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: York
|
If you bypass the bias resistor you will get fractionally higher input impedance (assuming an AC coupled circuit), but apart from that there is very little to be gained; the tail resistor still dominates the performance.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
|
Quote:
And since you are partly to blame for me wanting to try it... http://i406.photobucket.com/albums/p...uckAmp17-1.jpg Last edited by Printer2; 25th October 2011 at 10:48 PM. |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to bias Long tail pair....?? | RRITESH | Solid State | 83 | 15th August 2011 05:20 PM |
| Long-tail pair phase splitter | sdinfo | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 21st September 2010 12:35 AM |
| Long Tail Pair Linearizer | Electrone | Solid State | 17 | 21st April 2009 02:25 PM |
| 5687 long tail pair | NickC | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 14th May 2002 01:04 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09872 seconds (76.39% PHP - 23.61% MySQL) with 10 queries |