|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Hi:
I am planning to build TDA1541 based DAC using boards from a diyaudio member and I/V & Tube stage as posted by Thorsten Loesch in 2005 (see attached image). I am just a beginner thus need some help. Here are two questions, 1) What changes I have to do in this Thorsten circuit if I want to try 6H30 instead of ECC88? 2) Is this the last version by Thorsten or is there any upgraded version? I mean this is from 2005, any 2011 version? Regards |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Just curious- since excellent ECC88 are easily available and the design for that tube has been worked out, why not start with the original circuit, get it working, then start experimenting once you understand its strong and weak points?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Hague
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
I believe you are referring to increased gain if we bypass the cathode resistor with a capacitor. But what are the effects on sound quality if we increase gain this way? Kindly help me learn. What is the disadvantage of lower gain in this circuit, what is the advantage of maintaining the 33 times gain here? I am rather very confused Besides gain, please help me understand other changes in circuit if needed with why and how explanation. Last edited by new2hifi; 5th October 2011 at 03:08 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Hi:
The question was originally asked in digital section. I am puzzled by lack of responses. Either there were few experts on tubes there or everybody was avoiding touching Master Thorsten's work. Nonetheless, here is information about this curcuit in Thorsten's own words as copied from audioasylum, 03/15/05. "It is a simple ECC88/7308 with a choke or CCS load, biased negative minimally (around -0.1V) from a 47R I/V resistor (and the -2mA offset current for digital silence) and with a 10R Cathode resistor. Anode Voltage around 75V IIRC. The one added trick is an "anti sinc" filter using the most primitive methode of a parallel RLC Circuit. Good output coupling capacitor (2.2uF Mundorf Silver or AN Copper)" Kindly help! |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Barely. Close to "not at all." 10R raises the plate resistance by about 300R, and the choke impedance is thousands of time higher.
My advice still stands- build it as-is first, get a feel for what it does well and what it doesn't, then direct your experimentation toward the latter, rather than deciding a priori that the tube needs to be changed.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
A bit of calculation:
TDA1541 has full scale current output of 4 mA p-p, that is 1,41 mA RMS. The 47 ohm resistor will convert this current into 66 mVRMS at the grid of the ECC88. The current source loaded ECC88 will have a gain about equal its mu, so full scale output of the complete stage is a little over 2 VRMS which is what a CD output stage is "supposed to do". In my opinion the most elegant way to reduce the gain is to lower the 47 ohm I/V resistor. When I remember well in the original Philips datasheet of the TDA1541 there is an indication of the maximum value of the I/V resistor being 27 ohm for distortion reasons. A 27 ohm I/V resistor would give some 1,25 VRMS output which might better suit your "gain structure". Besides I would not be surprised the lower value resistor resulting in better overall sound. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sarasota, FL
|
Has anyone built this I/V, and how did it sound with the ECC88?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
|
Quote:
pieter t, I am very thankful to you for your analysis, however, can you please also guide me about the operational parameters of the 6H30 in this circuit, i.e. changes to B+ and cathode resistor? |
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ultimate twin TDA1541a DAC kit w/ tube output stage | Julien_M | Swap Meet | 6 | 14th September 2010 04:28 AM |
| Best and final TDA1541A output stage | studiostevus | Digital Line Level | 13 | 10th September 2010 03:01 PM |
| Thorsten's Valve Output Stage with TDA1541DAC | juancho | Digital Source | 73 | 29th April 2007 01:28 PM |
| Question about Thorsten's Tube Phono Pre | BHD | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 1st February 2007 01:12 AM |
| Another I/V stage for TDA1541A | Sandor | Digital Source | 1 | 6th December 2006 07:09 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11793 seconds (81.37% PHP - 18.63% MySQL) with 11 queries |