|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Niederösterreich
|
I was given a box full of some Rifa 5600uf @ 420v capacitors today. These are electrolytic caps and I was planning to use them in series for the power supply of a PP 6550 amp I am working on. Anyone know of any drawbacks to using this much capacitance in a tube amp? The PS will be CLC with SS diodes and around 120uf for the first C; 6hy @ 400ma. choke and the two monsters in series for around 2800uf @ 800v. B+ is around 580v. Do such large caps normally have higher ESR/ESL?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Your PSU will have a subsonic resonance at about 1.2Hz. Not necessarily a problem, although this could be in the range of syllabic rate for speech or music. The characteristic impedance will be about 46 ohms, so difficult to damp effectively. Smaller C would give a higher frequency, but better damped.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Seattle Area
|
You could change from CLC to CRC or flat out C and eliminate the resonance. With that amount of cap there should be plenty of ripple attenuation.
Beware that the caps will suck quite a bit of current at turn-on. Soft start (resistor in series with the primary of the transformer that's shorted with a relay after the supply is up) is definitely needed. Otherwise, you're almost guaranteed to pop fuses or blow the rectifier diodes. ~Tom
__________________
"50 % of the game is mental and the other 50 % is being mental. I've got that part down, no problem." http://www.neurochrome.com/audio |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Niederösterreich
|
Thanks for the reply guys. Sounds like these should be fine then. Will implement current limiting upon turn-on. I have heard hey are quite nice caps as well, long life and supposedly low ESR/ESL (have not seen any numbers though). Will proceed as planned.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: UK
|
I fould that large caps didn't work for me in a CLCRC circuit (excluding of course the first cap). The sound was very plain and boring, so I switched from the 330uF to 100uF and the music had better definition and timing. That might be due to the slower recharge/discharge times of the higher C values.
Anyway, give them a go, but please compare them with 100uF values as well. Andrew |
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Niederösterreich
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Your caps should only fully discharge when you switch your amp off (assuming you have bleeder resistors). At all other times the last thing you want is full discharge, as this leads to serious levels of hum!
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Niederösterreich
|
So is Andrew referring to the dynamic charge-discharge when the amp is in operation? Do the smaller caps really do this faster, and a better question is will this actually have audible difference in a class AB P-P amp?
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
I have no idea what he means. Perhaps he can explain it himself.
A smaller cap will certainly drop more voltage for a given withdrawal of charge - that comes simply from the definition of capacitance. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09339 seconds (81.51% PHP - 18.49% MySQL) with 9 queries |