|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
Anyone have any suggestions for a DIY headphone amp? I was looking into the SSMH, but I'd rather use something with a 12VDC power supply instead of a 48VDC one. I toyed around, and designed this:
![]() I substituted 6J6's for the 19J6's called for in the original SSMH design, and replaced the 48VDC PSU with a 12VDC PSU. From there, I adjusted the resistors accordingly to keep the gate-source voltage at 5v. I am fairly new to DIY headphone amps, so I wanted a "pro" to take a look at it first. So, be nice? The picture has a few typos; you need a ~1-2A @ 12VDC PSU, not a .5A one, and the "48V" should obliviously read "12V". |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Not sure how well the 6J6 is going to operate on 12V.. The main reason for the 48V supply was to have sufficient B+ for proper operation of the tubes.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midland, Michigan
|
It's not going to work with a 12 volt supply.
If you must use 12 volts, why not use a transistor rather than a tube as your first stage amplifier?
__________________
Frank |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
That design is a bit marginal even at 48V supply. The 6J6 is not brilliantly linear, although a headphone amp has quite small signals. The big problem at 12V supply will be distortion created in the source impedance (volume control, plus grid stopper) by grid current.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
12v B+ on a 6J6? Are you going to get enough (or any...) anode voltage movement?
Edit - Ooops beaten to it while checking the 6J6 spec...
__________________
Yes, conservatism thrives on low intelligence and poor information. But the liberals in politics... continue to back off, yielding to the supremacy of the stupid. It's turkeys all the way down. - George Monbiot, guardian.co.uk, 6 Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
12AU7 can work at low voltages, but it won't be very linear.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
Gwah, I thought the "6" in "6J6" meant 6v. Anywho, not to be a bother, but would you have a suggestion on what to change out? Pardon my noobiness; I am willing, and wanting, to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
|
the first 6 refers the the heater voltage...
The 6J6 and 19J6 are essentially the same tube with different heater circuit characteristics. Change nothing out in the signal circuit - you will need AT LEAST 48V B+, as discussed more would actually be better, although Pete may disagree.
__________________
Yes, conservatism thrives on low intelligence and poor information. But the liberals in politics... continue to back off, yielding to the supremacy of the stupid. It's turkeys all the way down. - George Monbiot, guardian.co.uk, 6 Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Note that you will need to add resistance in series with the filaments as they form part of the output circuit, and you want to drop ~ half of the supply voltage across the FET and the other half across the resistor-filament combination for best linearity, and at a certain point excess voltage across the FET means excessive dissipation.. Go back the original circuit and calculate the series resistance based the filament current and as designed source voltage.. I think 51 ohms might be close enough **but check it** 5W resistor min...
Also Pete is a regular here, you might just send him a PM and see what changes he suggests to use the 6J6...
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Computer based 4 way x-over ? | matsj | PC Based | 6 | 19th October 2011 07:25 AM |
| PC-based server versus network-based player | hillbear | PC Based | 14 | 12th July 2011 12:13 AM |
| Chipamp-based Regulator? | gootee | Power Supplies | 12 | 22nd January 2007 05:05 PM |
| Yet another Opamp based regulator | banana | Power Supplies | 4 | 22nd January 2007 02:46 AM |
| Choosing a sub driver based on T/S... | manxam | Multi-Way | 2 | 21st February 2004 10:16 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10276 seconds (78.87% PHP - 21.13% MySQL) with 10 queries |