Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd October 2011, 08:34 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Default 6J6-based SSMH?

Anyone have any suggestions for a DIY headphone amp? I was looking into the SSMH, but I'd rather use something with a 12VDC power supply instead of a 48VDC one. I toyed around, and designed this:

Click the image to open in full size.

I substituted 6J6's for the 19J6's called for in the original SSMH design, and replaced the 48VDC PSU with a 12VDC PSU. From there, I adjusted the resistors accordingly to keep the gate-source voltage at 5v. I am fairly new to DIY headphone amps, so I wanted a "pro" to take a look at it first. So, be nice?

The picture has a few typos; you need a ~1-2A @ 12VDC PSU, not a .5A one, and the "48V" should obliviously read "12V".
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2011, 08:45 PM   #2
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Not sure how well the 6J6 is going to operate on 12V.. The main reason for the 48V supply was to have sufficient B+ for proper operation of the tubes.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2011, 08:46 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Frank Berry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Midland, Michigan
It's not going to work with a 12 volt supply.
If you must use 12 volts, why not use a transistor rather than a tube as your first stage amplifier?
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2011, 09:03 PM   #4
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
That design is a bit marginal even at 48V supply. The 6J6 is not brilliantly linear, although a headphone amp has quite small signals. The big problem at 12V supply will be distortion created in the source impedance (volume control, plus grid stopper) by grid current.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2011, 09:09 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
aardvarkash10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
12v B+ on a 6J6? Are you going to get enough (or any...) anode voltage movement?

Edit - Ooops beaten to it while checking the 6J6 spec...
__________________
Yes, conservatism thrives on low intelligence and poor information. But the liberals in politics... continue to back off, yielding to the supremacy of the stupid. It's turkeys all the way down. - George Monbiot, guardian.co.uk, 6 Feb 2012
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2011, 09:16 PM   #6
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
12AU7 can work at low voltages, but it won't be very linear.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2011, 11:23 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Berry View Post
It's not going to work with a 12 volt supply.
If you must use 12 volts, why not use a transistor rather than a tube as your first stage amplifier?
Gwah, I thought the "6" in "6J6" meant 6v. Anywho, not to be a bother, but would you have a suggestion on what to change out? Pardon my noobiness; I am willing, and wanting, to learn.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd October 2011, 11:39 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
aardvarkash10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Auckland, NZ
the first 6 refers the the heater voltage...

The 6J6 and 19J6 are essentially the same tube with different heater circuit characteristics.

Change nothing out in the signal circuit - you will need AT LEAST 48V B+, as discussed more would actually be better, although Pete may disagree.
__________________
Yes, conservatism thrives on low intelligence and poor information. But the liberals in politics... continue to back off, yielding to the supremacy of the stupid. It's turkeys all the way down. - George Monbiot, guardian.co.uk, 6 Feb 2012
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2011, 12:22 AM   #9
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Note that you will need to add resistance in series with the filaments as they form part of the output circuit, and you want to drop ~ half of the supply voltage across the FET and the other half across the resistor-filament combination for best linearity, and at a certain point excess voltage across the FET means excessive dissipation.. Go back the original circuit and calculate the series resistance based the filament current and as designed source voltage.. I think 51 ohms might be close enough **but check it** 5W resistor min...

Also Pete is a regular here, you might just send him a PM and see what changes he suggests to use the 6J6...
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 4th October 2011, 03:46 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinkr View Post
Note that you will need to add resistance in series with the filaments as they form part of the output circuit, and you want to drop ~ half of the supply voltage across the FET and the other half across the resistor-filament combination for best linearity, and at a certain point excess voltage across the FET means excessive dissipation.. Go back the original circuit and calculate the series resistance based the filament current and as designed source voltage.. I think 51 ohms might be close enough **but check it** 5W resistor min...

Also Pete is a regular here, you might just send him a PM and see what changes he suggests to use the 6J6...
So like this? I was wondering exactly what goes where; I can't visualize it without a diagram.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Computer based 4 way x-over ? matsj PC Based 6 19th October 2011 07:25 AM
PC-based server versus network-based player hillbear PC Based 14 12th July 2011 12:13 AM
Chipamp-based Regulator? gootee Power Supplies 12 22nd January 2007 05:05 PM
Yet another Opamp based regulator banana Power Supplies 4 22nd January 2007 02:46 AM
Choosing a sub driver based on T/S... manxam Multi-Way 2 21st February 2004 10:16 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:42 AM.

Page generated in 0.10276 seconds (78.87% PHP - 21.13% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio