Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 29th September 2011, 01:13 PM   #1
mantha3 is offline mantha3  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Default Passive Preamp Mod help

Hi,

I'm thinking about making a mod to my passive preamp... I’m not an engineer and wanted to bounce my idea off of the group. My passive drives a tube amp and the problem I’m having is something I think tube amp people may have seen and can relate to so I put this question on this forum. I appreciate any time in talking on this topic all.

Background.
I have a home built passive preamp. This passive pre has a 100 K attenuator and it is routed to a pair of outputs. I built the passive so I could connect my tube amp and a sub woofer powered by a plate amp. If I have just the tube amp connected the sound is great and the unit works well. If I am running the system with just the tube amp and then connect to the passive on the 2nd set of the sub woofer the subwoofer sort of sucks the life out of the tube amp. Things sound fine but the volumn level on the tube amps drops a decent amount. I have a second tube amp that I’ve tested with.. If I connect the 2nd tube amp the issue I described with the plate amp of the sub is not happening

Issue –
I think the impedance of the tube amp and the plate amp on the subwoofer is the issue. I think the volts of the signal from the passive pre get sucked into the subwoofer where the volts can flow less restricted.

Possible cheap fix –
I found some talk on this forum that I think is related (I think)… I read some items that make me think 22k or 47k resistors on the (+) wire to the ouput RCA jacks may be the fix. I think I’d just need four resistors… Disconnect the (+) wire connected to one of the ouput RCA jacks and insert between the (+) wire and the (+) solder tab of the ouput RCA the resistor. I’d do this for the R and L of each channel. The idea here is that the resistors will isolate the two output channels from one another and the impedance bug won’t be so apparent.

I appreciate the help of the DIY group here… Again, I put this on the Tube Amp forum as I thought the tube amp folks may have experience with this given the impedance of tube amps…
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2011, 01:23 PM   #2
sakis is offline sakis  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
sakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: nea makri athens greece
i think that it might help but will not solve the problem totally

the best way is to probably drive a Buffer in a way to isolate the problem of impedance...

since its for a sub almost anything will do the job .... stay with this .... a passive 100k to a source that has very high impedance is the cleanest you will ever get dont destroy it with unrelated signals or impedance

( thanks to your amplifier's impedance except clean you loose very litle of the dynamics in low power ...this is importand to keep and this is why solid state people with amplifier impedance of 22-47K cannot be happy with passives or even B1 buffers ...in low listening levels more kick is required ... )
__________________
SERVICE ΙΑΠΩΝΙΚΩΝ ΜΗΧΑΝΗΜΑΤΩΝ ΗΧΟΥ www.eastelectronics.gr
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2011, 04:15 PM   #3
mantha3 is offline mantha3  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Ok, I think I got ya. run a buffer stage in the circuit.

So in my circuit... Do just run a buffer between the source and the passive preamp? or between the passive and the tube amp?

Yes, newbie here
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2011, 04:30 PM   #4
sakis is offline sakis  Greece
diyAudio Member
 
sakis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: nea makri athens greece
keep the passive as is .... use a parallel out from the passive to drive a buffer and then from the out of the buffer drive your sub
__________________
SERVICE ΙΑΠΩΝΙΚΩΝ ΜΗΧΑΝΗΜΑΤΩΝ ΗΧΟΥ www.eastelectronics.gr
  Reply With Quote
Old 29th September 2011, 04:51 PM   #5
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
Or, if you're ambitious, use a high quality buffer to drive both- 100k is pretty high for a passive, and any cable capacitance can cause HF errors. I've published a good tube buffer, and there are no doubt many other good designs out there.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2011, 08:54 PM   #6
mantha3 is offline mantha3  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Sakis, SY,

I've been doing some research on buffer stages... I agree a buffer from the passive to the Sub Woofer would be a help. Since this buffer would not be in the signal to my Tube Amp I'm thinking of a real basic PASS B1 Buffer Between the Passive and the Sub. Cheaper and I don't think I'd really hear the benefits of a tube buffer out of the sub.

???

I appreciate the advice!
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2011, 09:49 PM   #7
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
That would work fine. So would a cheap opamp buffer. Whatever is easiest for you.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2011, 09:53 PM   #8
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by SY View Post
I've published a good tube buffer...
Were? Is it on public display on the interwebs?
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2011, 10:11 PM   #9
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
That's "teh interwebs," dude.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 13th October 2011, 11:10 PM   #10
diyAudio Moderator
 
pinkmouse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Chatham, England
T' interweb, happen...

Don't bother Michael, it doesn't sound of anything, just sits there and glows.
__________________
Al
I conceive of nothing, in religion, science or philosophy, that is more than the proper thing to wear, for a while. Charles Fort
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Preamp disappointment and passive mod??? KanedaK Analog Line Level 10 21st April 2011 06:12 PM
Passive cooling PSU mod Fuzzymuff Power Supplies 4 6th December 2009 12:50 PM
T-amp stealth mod in passive biwiring Mr.Mekulic Class D 6 28th June 2006 08:25 PM
Newbie question: passive volume control mod for DAC Ichabod Analogue Source 0 4th November 2004 01:34 PM
Passive Preamp Rarkov Analogue Source 77 15th April 2003 06:51 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 01:41 AM.

Page generated in 0.10905 seconds (82.98% PHP - 17.02% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio