Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th September 2011, 01:41 PM   #1
Cassiel is offline Cassiel  Greenland
diyAudio Member
 
Cassiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madrid
Default How do they get away with this?

I'd like building compact amps and preamps but it always worries me the distance between the power transformer and the signal circuit (SMPS may be an option, haven't tried that yet). So when I see something like this I wonder. Is it enough a metal screen around the tube? I really don't understand how they can get away with that PT so close to the inputs. But it seems it can be done. Is it because that is a buffer stage? I have a small torodial PT and my guitar preamp circuit has quite some gain. Would it be a waste of time to try something similar? Any tricks? I have also seen people using metallic mesh screens (2nd pic). What works best?

http://www.hdmag.dk/valvulator.jpg

Click the image to open in full size.

Last edited by Pano; 20th September 2011 at 04:26 PM. Reason: photo linked
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 03:23 PM   #2
Cassiel is offline Cassiel  Greenland
diyAudio Member
 
Cassiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madrid
Oh well, I have read the manual.

Quote:
The custom
power transformer is ruggedly built to withstand years of road
abuse. It features a low noise design that allows for installation
in tight quarters and close proximity to other devices with
minimum hum and noise.
So there's hum and noise. No big surprise after all. So I'm narrowing down my questions. No mu-metal here so what's best to isolate the trafo? Copper, aluminium or steel? Solid or mesh? Maybe I should use the search bottom...probably this has been asked before.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 03:35 PM   #3
Merlinb is offline Merlinb  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: York
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassiel View Post
No mu-metal here so what's best to isolate the trafo? Copper, aluminium or steel? Solid or mesh?
A screen like that can only shield against electric fields, not magnetic ones, so the type of metal is immaterial (geddit?!).
Solid or mesh, it doesn't really matter since we're working at low frequencies.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 03:42 PM   #4
TheGimp is offline TheGimp  United States
diyAudio Member
 
TheGimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
Mu metal will help, however bending it changes it's characteristics. Proper shields are made to shape and then heat treated by taking them above the critical temperature (currie point?) and cooling them at a rate to optimize their shelding properties.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 03:45 PM   #5
Joschl is offline Joschl  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Ruhrgebiet
I guess the metal screen around the tube in the first picture is only against heat radiation to the electrolytics.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 04:10 PM   #6
Cassiel is offline Cassiel  Greenland
diyAudio Member
 
Cassiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madrid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Merlinb View Post
(geddit?!).

Affirmative, over and out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 04:24 PM   #7
Pano is offline Pano  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
Pano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: North Carolina
Blog Entries: 4
Please be kind to your fellow forum readers of limited bandwidth. Don't include inline photos of 1.4 Meg
Please see this thread: Pictures -- Why Not attach Them ??
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 04:28 PM   #8
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pano View Post
Please be kind to your fellow forum readers of limited bandwidth. Don't include inline photos of 1.4 Meg
Please see this thread: Pictures -- Why Not attach Them ??
And not so limited bandwidth, even here at work it took 30 seconds to load and I had to resize it in firefox so that the thread displayed properly..
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 04:29 PM   #9
Cassiel is offline Cassiel  Greenland
diyAudio Member
 
Cassiel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Madrid
Sorry for that. That photo grows all by itself....it wasn't that big. You can delete it if you want to.


Fryette Vavulator (Tube Buffer/Special Sauce))
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2011, 05:26 PM   #10
markusA is offline markusA  Sweden
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Blog Entries: 8
Interesting dilemma that I've wondered about myself.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 PM.

Page generated in 0.10908 seconds (82.24% PHP - 17.76% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio