diyAudio

diyAudio (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/)
-   Tubes / Valves (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/)
-   -   PP PSU: How much ripple is too much ripple? (http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/tubes-valves/196294-pp-psu-how-much-ripple-too-much-ripple.html)

DrewP 9th September 2011 11:23 PM

PP PSU: How much ripple is too much ripple?
 
While PSUD II enables us to prototype PSU's to get ludicrous low levels of ripple, how far should we really take things?

I'm building a PP EL84 amp (triode connected) and trying not to compromise it but still be realistic.

Power tranny secondaries are 240v and I'm planning on using SS bridges, not tube rectifiers.

I have half a dozen 470uf caps available, 2 with 450v rating and 4 with 350v rating.

There's no space in the chassis for a choke, so can anyone advise on a decently performing pi or CRCRC filter to suit my needs?

Output tube draw will be class A at about 140mA (35mA per EL84)

Input and phase splitter are 6SN7 configured as gain plus concertina.

All advice gratefully accepted.

(I'd prefer not to have to go shopping for new PSU caps if I could help it)

razorrick1293 9th September 2011 11:53 PM

i think something like 10% was acceptable on PP and >5% on SE as PP has a certain amount of a cencelling effect. seeing as its triode mode, your going to have ripple on G2 aswell, as the plate which might want less ripple. you should be fine with around 24v ripple. as for those filter caps, they sound way too big for a tube amp. ive never used bigger than 220uF for a reservoir. then with appropriate dropping resistors in the PSU, you should be fine.

Vinylsavor 10th September 2011 08:38 AM

Hi!

This also depends on the sensitivity of your speakers.
The easiest way is to just try with minimum filtering, say the suggested 10%. Then increase filtering if you get too much hum until you are happy.

Best regards

Thomas

DrewP 10th September 2011 08:41 AM

Well a single 470uf after the bridge would give me well under 10% ripple voltage (closer to 1% from the calcs I've crunched), but a pi filter using an R and at least one more of the 470's would surely improve things significantly...

artosalo 10th September 2011 11:27 AM

. As an example, I just prototyped with 6L6 (6P3S-E) stereo power output stage (UL).
The power supply is a full wave rectifier with some 450 Vdc output voltage.
There are two 390 F/ 350 V capacitors connected in series after the diode bridge forming a 195 F total capacitance. This voltge is then directly supplied the the center taps of the OPT's. The total standing current from the power supply is some 250 mA.

Measured hum level was -72 dB (ref = 30 W).

When an extra (single) 180 F was added in parallel with existing capacitors, the hum level dropped to -80 dB.

These hum levels were created at the output stage completely. The filtering of the phase splitters and voltage amplifying stages were sufficient and did not have any effect to the results.

Chris Daly 10th September 2011 12:00 PM

An emitter follower transistor on a heatsink and insulated from the metal of the heatsink in this case one with high voltage capability will reduce ripple values, and be far more effective than simple passive components. At 450vDc your choices of transistor are quite a few as these parts are common in TVs- Suggest bias to begin at 6 ma ie 2x 33k resistors and.arrange the mid point of the two resistors to have a .33uf cap to ground then another .33 uf from the base to ground.

hope this helps cheers / chris

DF96 10th September 2011 12:23 PM

I am using a single 250uF cap to power a stereo pair of 5-20 (EL34 ultralinear). The output balance reduces hum, and negative feedback reduces it further.

With the benefit of hindsight I might have aimed at lower ripple. This is not because of hum, but hum intermodulation in the output stage. Hum cancels. Hum IM does not. Fortunately NFB reduces IM too. Back of envelope calculations suggest that hum IM will be sufficiently low, but without much margin for error.

DrewP 10th September 2011 10:37 PM

Hmm, this is rapidly getting complex!

Basic gist from responses seems to be that with the caps I'm using a PI filter ought to be more than meeting the needs if I don't want to go to more complex arrangements such as regulators.

I'll need a series resistor to drop the 340v peak down to a stable 310 or so anyhow.

I'll start with 470u 150R 470u and see how we go.

trobbins 11th September 2011 12:09 AM

artosalo, out of interest did you have matched output tube idle currents, or better still were you able to check output hum levels whilst you varied idle current mismatch?

Ciao, Tim

Alastair E 11th September 2011 12:19 AM

How about a simple ripple-filter with say, a MOSFET?

Quick, easy, dirty and fairly reasonable....

--Just a thought.....


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:49 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2