
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
12th August 2011, 12:18 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member

LTspice and simulating tube circuits?
I've recently ran into something very odd.
The plots doesn't seem to match the fft? Look at this and tell me what you see? The left simulation appears to have a ragged response, really ugly. The fft shows much better than the sim on the right with the smooth nice looking curve? What am I missing here? Ok, I'll give a hint... The left sim uses a smps @ 23kHz while the right one uses idealized voltage sources. Wich would sound better? Things like this makes my head spin. Last edited by markusA; 12th August 2011 at 12:23 PM. 
12th August 2011, 12:26 PM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Stittsville, Ontario, Canada

What you are missing is the sharp spike at 20KHz.
Forget about the fft stuff 60 or 80 db down, you wont see that in the top curves. But it is that 20KHz spike that is giving you the wavy ripples in the left hand curve.
__________________
Robert McLean 
12th August 2011, 12:36 PM  #3 
diyAudio Member

I guess I can treat you to another fft as well, this one represents the previous sim on the right but with a simmed smps @ 23kHz. (The smps model is ran with the tube circuit)
Would the superimposed 23kHz ripple be audiable in any way? I don't have the right terms for it, harmonics or modulations of sort lower in frequency but generated by the switching frequency? If the 23kHz ripple is harmless the left sim is one magnitude better than the right one, if it's harmful the right one (with a really good psu) might be a better solution? (The plot in this post shows the worst of both cases, the right sim with a 120mVpp 23kHz ripple on the B+.) 
12th August 2011, 01:13 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Minnesota

How do you expect anyone to give you useful feedback when we have no idea what you are doing?

12th August 2011, 01:35 PM  #5 
diyAudio Member

I'm asking on how to interpret graphs since the circuits themselves are protocircuits nothing more.
If I can't read the output the sims will mean very little. What am I doing... I'm comparing a couple of different topologies for DCcoupled tube buffers with smps. I have a long term project building a digital preamp with dsp and tube output stages. Since it'll be 8 channels and fully balanced, the difference beween using one triode or 4 per channel will be substantial, both the workload and the financial part. I guess I'm trying to figure out if the cheap and simple solution is good enough? Is 60dB good enough? (I have a feeling I should be aiming for 80dB if I want silence) Will the HF ripple be audiable in any way? Lots of questions but I figured the plots were a good place to start. 
12th August 2011, 03:39 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN

It might be helpful if you posted the circuits.

12th August 2011, 04:25 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..

the 23KHz could cause problems several ways, most "audible" will involve intermodulation distortion prodcuts which can be below the 23 KHz
try a 20 KHz sine with the circuit showing 23 KHz ripple  you will most likely see a 3 KHz IMD difference product, simialrly with 10 KHz 
12th August 2011, 05:06 PM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Canada

Try just doing an FFT on a sine wave. You'll be surprised by the inaccuracy of the FFT. I can easily get LTSpice to show 60dB harmonics with a pure sine wave. With a few tweaks, you can get that substantially lower, but I still wouldn't trust harmonics below 60dB or so.
Each of these changes improves the accuracy of the FFT: Increase the simulation time. Reduce the maximum timestep (1u is a good starting value.) On the FFT menu, increase the "Number of data point samples in time" by 2 or 3 clicks. 
12th August 2011, 05:48 PM  #10 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..

I find the fft highly accurate with good sim, fft settings  a sine source itself should have better than 150 dB floor
add the .option plotwinsize=0 directive always use an integer number of periods of the stimulus, easy if you sim to a integer ms length, say 10 mS with integer KHz input Blackman window works well but requires >4x periods to completely resolve frequencies sometimes settling time is required so you may need to take the fft over a specified time, or change the start saving data time in the .tran to allow for settling max time step should be smaller than any gain device Ft, feedback loop gain intercept, and for high fft resolution give >10k points per period there is no need to exactly calculate the max step since the sim will take variable steps as required by accuracy setting anyway  the point used for the fft are interpolated to the exact sampling time  the order of the interpolation filter is what you're setting with the fft Binomial Smoothing "points" setting 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
How do I post Images of LTSpice circuits and plots.  cbdb  Software Tools  4  26th May 2011 11:57 AM 
LTSpice and phono circuits testing, opinions?  Radioman62  Analogue Source  1  5th September 2010 08:01 PM 
LTspice  problem simulating simple rectifier  Pinkevin  Power Supplies  14  19th August 2010 10:08 AM 
Need help with tube models in LTSpice  Bitrex  Tubes / Valves  5  6th August 2009 07:28 PM 
New look on simulating tube distortion!  Barre  Instruments and Amps  33  3rd March 2006 09:11 PM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 