topology and PSRR - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 23rd August 2003, 12:31 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SIUE, Illinois, USA
Default topology and PSRR

firstly, i'm still basically learning electronics. in any case i'm working on a project that interest me that i want to use as a learning experience. its an overdriven tube pre-amp and a gainclone. why? most people are saying that the SPIKE protection circutry in the national power ICs is sonically bad and should be avoided.

so i was thinking about what would happen if you basically pre-distorted the input so that it is compressed/limited a bit. from more research i see that tubes have some of these abilities, and more so at low plate voltages.

so i was looking at requirements for this combo:
1.) the spike protection must never be activate during even clipped input signal. so output power will be limited, and i accept this for a prototype/fun test.
2.) the PSRR of the tube pre-amp limiter would have to be high because i'd like to keep this thing small. having multiple chokes that can't be within a half foot of anything is bad for size!
3.) there are 3 tubes that come to mind for this application: ecc86. ecc88. 12u7. i've heard the ecc88 is decent for low voltage apps. nothing about the 12u7.
4.) a minimum number of tubes should be used per side i wanted 1 tube per input channel in order to reduce any error between tubes.. i may make amps for bi amping that use a common tube preamp but i'm worried that the effects of the audio crossover will affect the signal and accidently trigger SPIKE in rare cases.

but i was looking into the topolgy for the input, like i've seen some long tailed pair designs, and at low voltage i feel i could use a current source in the tail instead of a resistor, but i forgot if that affected PSRR any. cathode follower is ok, but i'm worried it may be harder to overdrive to get the pre-distortion i am trying to test. and i'm not sure if it has better PSRR then anything else.

so the main question is which topolgy has the best PSRR. the purpose is so i can try pre-distorting a signal in the hopes that the added distorting sounds better than an alternatively added distortion. the PSRR is becasue i hate hum.
__________________
if only it could be used for good, not evil...
  Reply With Quote
Old 23rd August 2003, 12:36 AM   #2
tiroth is offline tiroth  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
5687 LTP is a natural; other tubes can work well here. CCS much more linear.

http://www.anidian.com/audio/construct/p3a_adden2.shtml
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PSRR of CF w/ CCS Sink regal Tubes / Valves 7 30th June 2008 03:13 PM
Opamp PSRR lumanauw Solid State 10 12th March 2007 12:42 PM
Class D amp and the PSRR rtarbell Class D 14 12th January 2006 08:45 AM
How to predict PSRR ? Kilentra Solid State 6 9th July 2004 07:31 PM
Designing for PSRR ALW Solid State 19 16th June 2004 07:00 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 10:17 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2