|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SIUE, Illinois, USA
|
firstly, i'm still basically learning electronics. in any case i'm working on a project that interest me that i want to use as a learning experience. its an overdriven tube pre-amp and a gainclone. why? most people are saying that the SPIKE protection circutry in the national power ICs is sonically bad and should be avoided.
so i was thinking about what would happen if you basically pre-distorted the input so that it is compressed/limited a bit. from more research i see that tubes have some of these abilities, and more so at low plate voltages. so i was looking at requirements for this combo: 1.) the spike protection must never be activate during even clipped input signal. so output power will be limited, and i accept this for a prototype/fun test. 2.) the PSRR of the tube pre-amp limiter would have to be high because i'd like to keep this thing small. having multiple chokes that can't be within a half foot of anything is bad for size! 3.) there are 3 tubes that come to mind for this application: ecc86. ecc88. 12u7. i've heard the ecc88 is decent for low voltage apps. nothing about the 12u7. 4.) a minimum number of tubes should be used per side i wanted 1 tube per input channel in order to reduce any error between tubes.. i may make amps for bi amping that use a common tube preamp but i'm worried that the effects of the audio crossover will affect the signal and accidently trigger SPIKE in rare cases. but i was looking into the topolgy for the input, like i've seen some long tailed pair designs, and at low voltage i feel i could use a current source in the tail instead of a resistor, but i forgot if that affected PSRR any. cathode follower is ok, but i'm worried it may be harder to overdrive to get the pre-distortion i am trying to test. and i'm not sure if it has better PSRR then anything else. so the main question is which topolgy has the best PSRR. the purpose is so i can try pre-distorting a signal in the hopes that the added distorting sounds better than an alternatively added distortion. the PSRR is becasue i hate hum.
__________________
if only it could be used for good, not evil... |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
|
5687 LTP is a natural; other tubes can work well here. CCS much more linear.
http://www.anidian.com/audio/construct/p3a_adden2.shtml |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PSRR of CF w/ CCS Sink | regal | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 30th June 2008 03:13 PM |
| Opamp PSRR | lumanauw | Solid State | 10 | 12th March 2007 12:42 PM |
| Class D amp and the PSRR | rtarbell | Class D | 14 | 12th January 2006 08:45 AM |
| How to predict PSRR ? | Kilentra | Solid State | 6 | 9th July 2004 07:31 PM |
| Designing for PSRR | ALW | Solid State | 19 | 16th June 2004 07:00 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |