|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi All,
I am starting the construction of somewhat unusual power amplifier. The ONLY reason I am doing the project is that I have a pair of toroidal power transformers laying around for a long time which I want to use as output ones. The primary windings of these transformers are not center tapped. As a consequence I have very limited options as far as topology choices go. Again, This is the power amp project for output transformer with no CT and fairly low impedance ratio 1.5K:4 ohm (see below). For any other circumstances I could not recommend this design. Some additional constrains are: 1. Relatively low (<400V) B+ voltage. This way I can use components rated at 450V (caps, CCS). 2. using triodes. 3. Relatively high power efficiency. Using triodes gives dismal power efficiency regardless what you do but I still wanted the best possible. 4. balanced design (that's just me). 5. No feedback. 6. Simple and cheap. I considered six topology choices: parafeed, totem pole, SRPP and their bridged versions. Totem pole needs complex driver circuit arrangement so I did not consider it further. Parafeed has prohibitively low power efficiency (something like 5W out with 85W consuming ).SRPP is the worst choice for power amp because the circuit not only requires constant load but also can be optimized for only one value of load impedance. After some calculations and simulations using LT Spice I selected the least offending performer as far as power efficiency goes: SRPP bridge with EL86 tubes. The prototype schematics is attached (I have not tested it on bredboard yet). SRPP in each half of the bridge is optimized for 725 ohm load (giving Rk=333 ohm) Here are the simulated values (I do not put much faith in simulators but they are adequate for the order of the magnitude estimations): VB+=400V P total dissipated =40W P out = 4W ![]() efficiency 10% distortion : all harmonics on FFT plot are less then -50db (useless measurement by itself because Spice models are inaccurate. However, good guide to keep input signal at certain level to compare different topologies). I selected EL86 tubes because they work well with lower VB+. Comments are appreciated. If you have suggestions please let me know before I start assembling a circuit. Thanks
__________________
My System |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Eire
|
The DC blocking cap needs to be big and none polar. This can be achieved by using back to back electo's with a 1meg resistor at the negative leg cap node, bypass with a film cap.
Shoog |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bialystok
|
Ra (R1,R2) ? What for?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi Zibi,
RA is needed to balance currents in the load (it reduces transconductance of upper tube slightly). For high mu tubes it can be omitted. Ideally for unbypassed RK, RA=2*RK. The Phillips schematic you are referring is different, EL86 operates in the pentode mode.
__________________
My System |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Bialystok
|
Why current balance is needed if blocking capacitor is used?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
You could also build a circlotron!
But with EL86, the impedance of your transformer might be a little high...
__________________
Real tubes have top-caps |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Jutland
|
A few thoughts ...from a non-pro, which can probably be spotted
How about core-saturation for a toroid in SE? A problem, as no air-gap? How big's the toroid? Will it handle bigger tubes? Even a 300B runs fine on 400V. You want more Watt from a SE? Other OP-tube(s) in (P)SE and a CF to allow for low-Z drive/grid-current or is that not kosher? rgds, /tri-comp |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| URL Collection of Commercial Single Ended Integrated and Power Amplifier Devices | tiefbassuebertr | Solid State | 10 | 12th August 2011 09:30 PM |
| Power supply for Single Ended Amplifier | kmtang | Tubes / Valves | 20 | 27th June 2005 03:46 PM |
| High Power Single Ended Amplifier Club | Unison845 | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 27th April 2004 01:32 PM |
| has any one done this amplifier, i like single-ended | john-china | Solid State | 8 | 19th January 2004 07:43 AM |
| Using PP output transformers for single ended amp | SHiFTY | Tubes / Valves | 4 | 26th August 2002 07:18 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11110 seconds (76.63% PHP - 23.37% MySQL) with 11 queries |