Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

diyAudio Sponsor

Search for a tube at thetubestore.com                            Product reviews and more

Audio tubes for any amplifier: from high end home audio to classic guitar amps.

Quick links by tube type: 12AX7, EL34, 6L6, KT66, 6550, KT88, EL84, 12AU7, 12AT7, 6922, 6H30, 300B, 6V6, 6SN7 

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th July 2011, 02:35 PM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Melbourne
Default Mullard 5-20 with 6L6GC's?

Hi all,
I'm starting my first scratch-built tube amps, and after hearing one in the flesh, I've settled on a 5-20 as a base. Wow, what a lovely sound.

I'm a little stuck on optimizing the circuit for 6L6GC's (my preferred power tube), is there anything it would need to work best for these tubes?

I'm also looking at picking up some iron for them, namely a pair of 6.6k OPT's, probably Hammond 1650G's, and matching Hammond 374BX PT's.
Would these be suitable for the 5-20?

Any suggestions?

Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 03:23 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
It's a good tube choice. With a 6k6 load, 450V, and fixed bias, you can idle at 50mA and get decent tube life with low distortion. Expect 40W in ultralinear, a bit more in pentode.

The 5-20 can be improved a bit by using matched plate resistors on the phase splitter and a CCS in the cathode. But this is shaving things pretty fine- it's a good amp as-is.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 03:34 PM   #3
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Is there any truth in the idea that beam tetrodes, like 6L6, have a lower input impedance than pentodes (e.g. EL34) so can't be driven from high impedance valves like ECC83/12AX7? I have seen this stated in various places, but never managed to find any hard data or plausible explanation. Is it just a myth propagated by all you (present company excepted) US ECC83/pentode haters?
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 03:39 PM   #4
sreten is offline sreten  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brighton UK
Lundahl Transformers - 30W PP amplifier designed by Claus Byrith

Hi, definitely IMO worth a read regarding the 520 (and 510), rgds, sreten.
__________________
There is nothing so practical as a really good theory - Ludwig Boltzmann
When your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail - Abraham Maslow
  Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2011, 09:56 PM   #5
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by DF96 View Post
Is there any truth in the idea that beam tetrodes, like 6L6, have a lower input impedance than pentodes (e.g. EL34) so can't be driven from high impedance valves like ECC83/12AX7? I have seen this stated in various places, but never managed to find any hard data or plausible explanation. Is it just a myth propagated by all you (present company excepted) US ECC83/pentode haters?

This is the first time I have ever heard this, so I am not sure who is propagating this idea. I've not found evidence to support it in any short search either or from direct experience.. Would not the KT-66 and 77 be the subject of a similar conjecture? (Kinkless Tetrode?) I suspect a myth.. I've seen plenty of 5-20 with KT-66, 5881, and 7581..

I like ECC83 and certain pentodes a lot... Mainly as error amplifiers in my voltage regulators.. Actually used properly the ECC83 is a very linear device, just needs a little help driving a load - not always an issue depending on circuit design..
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 12:07 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
The Mullard topology is excellent and will yield good results with O/P trafos of modest cost, like Hammond. However, given its high RP and low gm, the 12AX7/ECC83 is a POOR choice for long tailed pair (LTP) phase splitter duty. A 12AT7/ECC81 as the LTP will yield approx. = stage gain, while exhibiting low RP and high gm.

SY's advice about a LTP tail CCS is spot on. A 10M45S integrated circuit is quite adequate for the job, but a more sophisticated current sink is, of course, OK.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 10:56 AM   #7
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
I think I may have seen the myth on Audio Asylum. Maybe I should take less notice of what I see there. I just wondered whether there was smoke without fire. Glad to be reassured.

My understanding is that ECC83 is a good choice for LTP phase splitter as it has high and stable mu. It is mu which primarily determines the ratio of differential-mode gain to common-mode gain, which is the main issue with an LTP phase splitter. In fact the mu is high enough that a tail CCS is not strictly necessary, whereas it is necessary with almost any lower gain valve. The snag with ECC83 is that it needs to be run rather too close to the grid current region so imbalance can result.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 04:38 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
This is a bit of a myth based most likely on the effect of interelectrode capacitance within the valve.
This capacitance is made worse by the effect of Cag times the mu (voltage gain) of the valve. This is known as the Miller effect. If say you have control grid to anode capacitance of 10pF and the voltage gain is 20 then the effective capacitance from grid to anode is 200pF. This capacitance is effectively 'seen' by the driving valve and becomes a loading impedance, but the effect is only really significant at radio frequencies.
The difference between a 6L6 and EL34 is much less then the different operating modes, ie, triode mode is much worse then pentode, with ultralinear somewhere in between, depending on tapping ratios.
Regards
Henry
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 04:46 PM   #9
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Blog Entries: 1
The 5-20 doesn't run the output tubes as triodes. The input capacitances are really, really small. 200pF is huge and VERY significant for audio purposes.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2011, 08:27 PM   #10
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
No I wasn't thinking of Miller effect. I assumed whoever started the myth was talking about grid current, but I can't think of any reasonable explanation why that would be worse in a beam tetrode than a pentode. Always nice to kill a myth!
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mullard 5-20 JDeV Tubes / Valves 137 17th February 2010 04:53 PM
Mullard 5-20/Maplin 4-20 modification to NON-Ultra Linear mode???? vinyvamos Tubes / Valves 1 28th January 2006 04:07 PM
Another Mullard 5-20. GeirW Tubes / Valves 3 30th November 2004 12:45 PM
Mullard 5-20 again icebear Tubes / Valves 3 16th December 2003 09:01 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:00 PM.

Page generated in 0.12662 seconds (80.34% PHP - 19.66% MySQL) with 10 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio