|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I have 4 PL 504's . Are they better used as SE or in a PP scheme. What is a realistic output I can get from them in PP ?
Are they as good as EL84's or better ? Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Munich, Bavaria
|
They are best used in TV sets as line output in the horizontal deflection amplifier or other switching applications. These tubes weren't build to match each other instead they should be able to withstand high voltage transients (off-switch spike from line transformer). This results in horrible differences not only in static parameters (bias), but particular in different gm. When G2-driven you don't have to worry about that BTW, since the G1 has far less distance to the cathode than the G2.
So far so good... SE sounds horrible, I can't say anything to PP. Maybe you could try triode operation. Your last sentence is..well..let me answer it this way: In a lovely operating deflection amp (steep slope, high current delivery), a PL504 is better. In a lovely sounding audio amp (linear, few harmonic distortion), a EL84 is better. Simply because these tubes were made for a specific reason |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
For conventional g1 drive they will be rather non-linear so PP would be best as you will get some cancellation of even-order distortion. G2 drive might linearise them enough that SE could work.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Another option I see is a circlotron.
__________________
Real tubes have top-caps |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brussels
|
Quote:
Used in S.E mode, PL504's will very likely sound terrible and I would not even consider this option for any good quality amp. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Wales
|
Some Cinema amplifiers used the forerunner of the PL504, the PL36.....
PL36 has a worse reputation than PL504 from what I gather.... |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Brussels
|
I remember I had a SANSUI SM-80 receiver who used a pair of PL36/25E5 in its ouput stage in Ab1 PP for about 30W ouput power. Whatever I did (parts replacement,upgrades,etc...) it still sounded terrible and I finally gave up. PL504's are more powerful but certainly not better in audio applications. To be avoided.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks for the replies. Looks like it isn't worth spending time and money on the 504. I have some EL84's too ! But since I have the 504's I thought I might as well try to do something with it. I'll try to see what it sounds like in triode mode if it doesn't take too much time.
I guess the PL509's ( which I do not have ) were better ? Cheers.
__________________
AM |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Palatiw, Pasig City
|
PL504 - EL504 15 watt ~ AUDIO DESIGN
Impedans of trafo for EL504 inSE Transformadores http://edonion.com/documents/EdonionSpeedy.pdf Unity coupled circuit amplifier. enjoy....
__________________
http://www.elab.ph/forum/index.php?topic=32688.0 |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Thanks Tony. I will explore this further. Apparently it can sound decent. I will know for sure only if I try it ! Since all parts will be different from other designs the only way to say how good will be by building one.
OP trafo is the only (big!) issue for me though I seem to have a way out of that one. Thanks.
__________________
AM |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Using SE OT for PP. | Cassiel | Tubes / Valves | 10 | 15th July 2010 10:44 AM |
| SE Trafo for PP use | dsavitsk | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 8th August 2007 08:27 PM |
| PP or SE for Horns? | Sheldon | Tubes / Valves | 21 | 20th January 2005 01:08 AM |
| SE or PP? | kmj | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 30th April 2004 05:21 AM |
| SE vs. PP | stigla | Tubes / Valves | 17 | 6th June 2002 02:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |