|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: columbia sc
|
Are there advantages to using separate transformers and rectifiers for the input/driver and output stages in a tube amp? If so, what are they? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
The main effect would be to swap one set of grounding issues for another set of grounding issues, and increase cost, weight etc.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London
|
I do this, simply because I optimised a preamp supply then put all 3 stages in one amp so had the preamp supply anyway. Advantage is that the parts are smaller in the small tube HT supply - small chokes - and you have more options for rectifiers, so I use an AZ1 mesh. Really nice choke input supply with all polypropylene caps.
This allows you to use a more basic supply for the final stage - like cap input. So you don't need such a high secondary voltage on the mains transformer as you would with choke input. It is bigger, but it can be better unless you make a monster choke input supply for the whole amp. Then you lose the AZ1 mesh unless you use multiple rectifiers in parallel. andy |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
|
I've done it so the input and drive stage can be operated from a higher supply voltage. I also regulate the input/drive stage supply.
Triode output stages typically need a pretty wide (peak to peak) drive voltage. Increasing the input stage supply voltage allowed me to design an input stage with very good linearity. I don't think it will present you with grounding issues, you just need to connect them at one (and only one) point. Best of luck with your project.
__________________
Tom |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
I have found with experiments, that the best sound comes from a PSU that has a single B+ feed for all the stages (per channel). Preferably thru a tube regulator, so there are no electrolytics in the signal path.
The sound improvement is surprisingly big, although 90% of it is only audible thru headphones. (At least in my cheap system.) I wouldn't separate my B+ feeds anymore for any reason. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I believe SY's RLD amp used such arrangements, i see no reason not to use that if you can......The Red Light District - another PP EL84 amp
__________________
http://www.electronicslab.ph/forum/i...?topic=32688.0 Last edited by Tony; 16th May 2011 at 10:08 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
As has been mentioned, in a power amp, a separate supply for the driver stage can be run at a higher voltage which can usefully increase swing and lower distortion. It's also amenable to simple regulation. In AB amps, there's an extra advantage- when the output stage's current increases with signal, the inevitable power supply droop is not transmitted to the driver stage, which can enhance stability.
I have not yet had any grounding issues with this arrangement when following basic rules.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.electronicslab.ph/forum/i...?topic=32688.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sofia
|
Quote:
I have been doing this in all my power amps, both SS or tube and will not have it any other way. It is cheaper and preferable soundwise to monoblocks. At least to my ears. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Torpoint
|
Its generally accepted that the final stages have much better PSRR (Power Supply Rejection Ratio) than the driver stages. As it is the final stages that put the biggest load on the PSU, it is them that cause problems in preceding stages. Far better to have the driver stages being fed form a well regulated supply which is separate from the power hungry output stage. This is true for valves, Bi-Fets, Mos-Fets and any other device that you care to mention.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Parallel output tubes/valves in push pull. Advantages/disadvantages? | Matt.B.H. | Tubes / Valves | 42 | 20th May 2010 03:27 AM |
| Input/Output Stages for Blackfin DSP | maczrool | Digital Line Level | 7 | 23rd February 2009 08:10 PM |
| Questions on BB1794 and AD1865 input to Rudolf Broertjes' and Pass D1 output stages | Jolojl | Digital Source | 0 | 14th April 2008 10:25 PM |
| what are the advantages of double core output transformers vs EI ? | bembel | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 2nd November 2006 02:24 AM |
| Advantages of output-transformers | Mikael Abdellah | Subwoofers | 10 | 28th December 2004 01:21 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11285 seconds (77.50% PHP - 22.50% MySQL) with 10 queries |