|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
I thought I had posted here asking about current feedback (for use in current source power amp) but I can't seem to find it. I remember someone suggesting adding extra resistance in the output tube's cathode for additional cathode degeneration. I was also thinking about using an approach similar to Schade but taken from the output pentode's cathode and summed at the grid of the driver. Like Schade the stage before the driver would need to have stable and rather large Zout of course but initial simulations seem to be promising.
Something like this is what I have in mind. ![]() I set the voltage source to 68k Z out in order to simulate a previous tube stage. The simulation seems to indicate that it works to reduce HD. Unfortunately it seems to be primarily HD2 that is reduced with much less effect on HD 3 and HD5. However, I don't fully trust distortion results from a sym. And in any case it should also be increasing Zout too which is what we want in this case. Any thoughts on this approach
__________________
If We The People refuse to hear the truth we will be ruled by liars. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Bear in mind that for a tetrode/pentode output you are not sensing the output current. Negative feedback controls what you sample, in this case the cathode current. For small signals the cathode and anode currents will be roughly proportional, but when negative peaks send the anode down below the screen you will get a kick in g2 current so the proportionality will be lost. If you want low distortion output current then use a triode, or use triode connection.
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
Interesting point. I hadn't thought of that. I wonder if UL would work as well as triode mode since the two taps are tracking each other and both contributing to the total current through the primary...
__________________
If We The People refuse to hear the truth we will be ruled by liars. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
|
If you return the screen supply negative side directly to the cathode, then the screen current will stay out of your feedback. (a common trick used for curve tracers)
__________________
Ohms Law V = I R |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
UL will be better than pentode mode, but it does not guarantee that the output current is equal to, or proportional to, the cathode current. Only a triode does that.
The screen-supply trick is another way to do it, as it effectively forces the g2 current to just circulate within the valve. OK if your signals don't go down to DC. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
Cool. Amazing what one can lear here.
__________________
If We The People refuse to hear the truth we will be ruled by liars. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Current feedback - Voltage feedback, how do I see the difference? | Ouroboros | Solid State | 810 | 21st May 2013 09:25 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |