|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Victoria
|
I have replaced the filter caps on one of my amps that has a tube rectifier
(6CA4) using a JJ 50uF multi-section. I think the originals were 40uF so I felt pretty safe going a bit higher. I have heard a lot about too much filtering putting stress on the rectifier tube and I do notice this amp has a low frequency vibration coming from the power supply. Should I be worried? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lindau
|
Hi!
check the datasheet of the tube and go with the max values there. 50uF is the max for this tube, but it requires a minimum transformer secondary resistance, which depends on the voltage. It is a common mistake to load rectifier tubes with too much capacitance. Rectifier tubes don't like high caps, they cause high repetetive peak currents and a high inrush current. Also soundwise smaller caps or choke input filters are the better choice Best regards ... Thomas
__________________
http://vinylsavor.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: massachusetts
|
Use a pi filter and you can put as much capacitance after the inductor as you like, within reason. Best suggestion is to look up detailed data on tube and possibly transformer and simulate in psud2 to check peak rectifier current. In most cases a 10 uf input cap does the job from what I have personally simulated
Last edited by ryuji; 10th April 2011 at 07:35 PM. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
|
New to tubes, didnt know they didnt like current spikes. Can someone tell me why? So whats the advantage of using a tube rectifier over solid state for (I'm assuming) a power supply?
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: massachusetts
|
Voltage drop, Lack of switching noise, soft power up.
Silicon has current limits too, recification only pushes current at ac peaks. |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
|
tubes are high voltage and low current stuff -usualy- , this is why they do not like high repetative peak currents. Same reason why most of them use an output tranformator. To match load impedance, as tubes usualy are unable to produce high current at output
As for using tube in a rectifier circuit, yet i have found no reason to do so. Surely there has gotta be something, i just do not know why. For some instruments -mainly guitar- a tube rectifier may be desired, it has different properitys then diodes. They can add a distorsion, and this can enhance a guitar sound. But i personaly would not use a tube rectifier for anything else than instrument amplifier. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Plainsboro, NJ
|
Vacuum rectifiers don't generate the switching noise PN junction diodes do. OTOH, the introduction of high PIV Schottky diodes made from silicon carbide deals with the noise issue. No PN junction, no noise.
![]() Vacuum rectifiers constructed with cathode sleeves start up slowly. Good "high" current vacuum rectifiers with cathode sleeves are getting harder and harder to find. OTOH, directly heated vacuum rectifiers, like the 5U4, 5R4, and 5Y3 start almost as quickly as SS diodes do. Negative temperature coefficient (NTC) inrush current limiting thermistors do a respectable job of taming start up surges. So, I will not design a HIFI power amp with anything other than SS B+ rectification. Low current vacuum rectifiers remain available and their use in small signal applications remains a reasonable choice. Quote:
A properly executing choke I/P filter causes the rectifier winding to exhibit a 100% conduction duty cycle. The critical current is that value which causes that 100% behavior to occur.
__________________
Eli D. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
Why you can't simply use a huge reservoir capacitor, as you would do in a solid state amp. (For one project using 5U4GBs for the main DC rail, 34uF meant an Isurge= 800mA, and 47uF was too much.) You have to keep that capacitor small enough, and use a subsequent LC or RC LPF to get rid of the AC ripple. The only other option is an L or R input ripple filter that holds down the recharge current at the expense of voltage output. Quote:
Otherwise, SS gives higher output voltages, has better regulation under load, can use larger filter capacitors (if the xfmr can withstand the higher peak currents) doesn't need heater power or another hole in the chassis. You can always use some sort of soft start/delay to let other VTs warm up before hitting 'em with the high voltage. |
||
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: massachusetts
|
I know its nitpicking but I use a 5c8s full wave indirect heated cathode rectifier, ipeak is 1.3~1.4 amps and rms current rating is 420 mA max. Also has 1700v reverse voltage rating.
Already knew it was capacitor behavior that does the pulse behavior but his current circuit uses capacitor input |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: massachusetts
|
For best ss power supply for regulation etc I think a custom built smps would be best? Filter stage before switching components filter out the ac line ripple and set switching rate at 30 to 40 khz and you'd have to be a dolphin our something to hear the hash noise? You'd also gain percise voltage control and regulation
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mains Filtering | audiofanaat | Power Supplies | 1 | 2nd February 2009 11:41 PM |
| filtering before LM386? | newsci | Chip Amps | 7 | 26th March 2008 09:18 AM |
| On active filtering | Dr.EM | Solid State | 22 | 7th June 2007 12:47 PM |
| CS4398 filtering? | leadbelly | Digital Source | 3 | 1st January 2007 10:10 PM |
| Bias filtering | eeka chu | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 13th January 2005 04:50 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |