|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 10,000 lakes
|
I've seen many 45, 2a3, 6BQ5 single ended tube amps outhere with only a few resistors and caps. How come the tubelab SE and simple SE have so many parts in them as I've always heard when it comes to single ended, simple is best. I am thinking about buying one of their kit but so many parts used gave me a reservation.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Just off the top of my head I think that is because most schematics are separated between psu and circuit. And the tubelab puts them both on one pcb so it appears as having a lot of parts.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
|
Just had a look at the tubelab schematic. There is a little more complexity but it is where it counts.
Besides in the end urban legends should remain urban legends. I mean simple is good. But sometimes complex is better. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
|
Simple circuits work well when the demands on it are low.
SE with small power requirements usually get by with the simplest of topologies. However as power output demands on it increase, especially with larger tubes ( with larger capacitances), the driver stages become "saturated" or there is "blocking distortion". Tubelabs design ensures that all these problems are looked into to maintain power output and minimise distortion. So as a result, the circuit becomes slightly more complicated. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 10,000 lakes
|
Not sure if i am convinced with the responses yet
I did some google and found this: The road to nirvana Looking at that schematics, there really only a few parts in the amp and i bet it sounds great. Too bad, i just don't have the skill to build it from scratch. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Tuebingen
|
Keep in mind, the tubelab SimpleSE schematic shows BOTH channels for stereo.
In addition (as Bas already stated), the PSU is shown - all in one schematic. So, looking at one channel only, I don't see the complexity?!? There are a few options (switchable if you like) shown, too. If you would look only at one possible configuration, the the urban legend rule would be satisfied - it's really a "Simple"SE in terms of layout (not talking about the work that went into it to optimize it, I guess). Martin |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: 10,000 lakes
|
You are probably right. My reason for posting is just to learn and not out to say any bad thing about tubelab as I am newbie and clueless about how these things work. I am sure there are good reason as to why they design circuit as such. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
RIP
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: C'ville VA, USA
|
I've never known George to add anything superfluous to any of his designs.
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central NC
|
I'll have to agree with Bas and Pedroskova on this one. Besides, it's all in how you view the word "simple". I've built lots of stuff from scratch, and I can tell you that it's no small task to build an amp of even "road to nirvana" simplicity. Parts count is only a tiny part of the equation; sourcing those parts, ordering, designing the enclosure, mechanical issues and post-build testing all conspire to increase the complexity of any project. I'm not going to even think of delving into the issue of circuit design.
What Tubelab has done is take care of most of these issues, while giving folks a chance to experiment and customize. His are proven designs that are extremely well-documented and thoughtfully executed. I haven't yet bought one of his boards, but you can bet your buns I'm gonna buy one - or one of each, if possible - as soon as I'm a bit more certain of my employment status. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
|
Well, I don't it's the responsibility of the forum to convince you of anything, only to share knowledge / experiences
![]() You should be able to find dozens of 45 SE schematics on the net without issue. I would recommend some basic reading here: www.wavelengthaudio.com/bugle.pdf This will give you yet another simple 45 schematic and the design methodology used including sidebars on how values are calculated. It really is a good read, even though I'm not a fan of SRPP. Finally, while the schematic you posted is fine, the cost of the OPTs alone will be probably be more than everything needed to build the TubeLab circuit, which is a solid design. As you're admittedly a newbie, don't expect to reach nirvana as a first project. Do think of it as a journey and have some fun along the way... and you'll learn lots. Best of luck on your first project. Regards, KM
__________________
... just because you're paranoid, it doesn't mean they're not after you... |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Single tube, Single ended, 20W, impossible? | dannydanger | Tubes / Valves | 35 | 3rd April 2012 01:19 AM |
| Tubelab Single Ended Amps | Structo | Tubes / Valves | 9 | 22nd December 2010 04:13 PM |
| Single Ended, Single driver: In-room distortion measurements | Gerrit Boers | Full Range | 4 | 27th November 2007 08:12 AM |
| Anyone play with the Zen Single-Stage Single-Ended Class A? | Rino odorico | Pass Labs | 13 | 29th August 2002 09:01 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11252 seconds (81.99% PHP - 18.01% MySQL) with 11 queries |