UL for EL84. 22-24% is better than the dogma....40% is lowest distortion.... - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 30th March 2011, 04:27 PM   #1
diyAudio Moderator Emeritus
 
Bas Horneman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Blog Entries: 18
Default UL for EL84. 22-24% is better than the dogma....40% is lowest distortion....

In doing some research about output transformers for the EL84 I found this:

"Virtually all transformer manufacturers today think that "UL" operation is defined as 40%, so their entire line is often offered with that tap point, with little understanding as to how the tap %, the plate-to-plate load, and indeed the tube itself are all intertwined. The 40% point got it's start from the original UL experiments that were done on 6L6 class tubes, that respond most to the UL influence at 43.0% of the winding. But Hafler (and Keroes) quickly learned that the optimum tap % was not only tube specific, but also loading specific as well, such that the optimum tap % is hardly 40% for all tubes or conditions. Early on, much of the information was derived empirically, as was certainly the case for Hafler's original transformer, the A-430. This transformer was specifically designed for EL34 tubes, under conditions of maximum power output with minimum distortion. With a 4.3K primary, it employs taps at 33%. But raise the load to 6K plate to plate or greater, and the optimum point becomes 40% for these tubes. The difference is not insignificant. EL84 and 6V6 class tubes work best with a 25% tap. Using a 40% tap produces very compromised performance with these tubes. Overall power output suffers, and particularly so at the HF end of the scale. 6550s generally do like 40%. Real KT88 are good with anything from about 20% to 50%, because this tube was designed specifically with UL operation in mind, and the list goes on."

diytube.com :: View topic - ST-35 with Tango Output Transformers

Unfortunately the author speaks about power and not so much distortion.

Anyone care to comment on this?
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2011, 04:46 PM   #2
SY is offline SY  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
SY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Chicagoland
Blog Entries: 1
Mullard gives detailed performance data for both 20% and 43% in the EL84 datasheet. I wouldn't be surprised if they did the same for some of their other output tubes.

There's an excellent analysis of all of this in Menno Vanderveen's new book. Worth reading for sure.
__________________
You might be screaming "No, no, no" and all they hear is "Who wants cake?" Let me tell you something: They all do. They all want cake.- Wilford Brimley
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2011, 05:43 PM   #3
Yvesm is offline Yvesm  France
diyAudio Member
 
Yvesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
Quote:
Anyone care to comment on this?
UL: Urban Legend . . . beuark !

Click the image to open in full size.

Compare drive requirement, output power and distortion.

My faith is to regulate the screen voltage.

Yves.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2011, 11:55 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
Quote:
My faith is to regulate the screen voltage.
Yves,

If a tertiary screen grid winding on the O/P trafo is employed, both regulated g2 B+ and ultralinear, local, NFB are available. Vanderveen's writings cover the subject, to some degree.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All,

Bas makes a good point about the UL %. The highly revered "iron" Freed wound for the H/K Cit. 2 is tapped at approx. 20%.
__________________
Eli D.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 06:34 AM   #5
Yvesm is offline Yvesm  France
diyAudio Member
 
Yvesm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ardeche
Yes ! I fully agree !
That's what H&K did in the very first published paper around an 807 IIRC . . .
But probably the cost of the OPT was too hi !
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 09:12 AM   #6
bigwill is offline bigwill  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
I think pentode mode can offer the lowest distortion, provided you give the screens a good stiff supply. UL is good because you can get away with no dedicated screen supply at all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 11:17 AM   #7
Ian444 is offline Ian444  Australia
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Brisbane QLD
Seven working amps in this house, all pentode mode. Three stereo amps, four guitar amps. There is nothing wrong with pentode mode IMO, in fact I like it the best Some people like triode mode, or UL, and others must have varying degrees of global NFB, that's all fine, each to their own.
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 03:23 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
richwalters's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Alps:Tube amp designs over 150W, SMPS guru.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigwill View Post
I think pentode mode can offer the lowest distortion, provided you give the screens a good stiff supply..
You recon?

Intermodulation thd performance is lowest with 40% UL and highest with true tetrode. SOmewhere there is a KT88 chart which confirms this.

UL in an MI amp is an expensive non-luxury. For HiFi, that's different. With a decent amount of global nfb, should snuff UL 40% operation IM THD to well below 1% and harmonics F2,3 to a tenth below this. Triode operation has a slightly higher IM THD compared to UL 40%.
So UL with 40% tap offers the lowest IM THD so it claims the quality king. Debatable ??

richy
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 05:32 PM   #9
bigwill is offline bigwill  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: UK
The way I see it, is that the purest way to linearise the output stage is actually global feedback, and anything that happens before than is convoluted, such as triode or UL mode. It's better to subtract the error at the beginning than try to do it with the screen grids (imo)
  Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2011, 06:31 PM   #10
jcx is online now jcx  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
pushing the gain to the outer loop can be shown to be optimum for distortion reduction with non-interacting gain stages
many may not appreciate the extra linearizing consequence of added gain at the output stage - the signal level at all previous stages is reduced for the same output so the preceeding stages give lower distortion due to the lower signal/bias ratio

tube amps can be limited by output xfmr bandwidth so you may not be able to stablize the amp with higher global feedback
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
4 x EL84 in UL PP, 470 B+!! is this right malcolmfraser Tubes / Valves 31 14th October 2010 02:15 PM
Lowest distortion (sub?)woofer up to 300hz? Spasticteapot Subwoofers 1 28th August 2010 08:42 AM
PSE UL EL84 or 6V6 or EL34? AudioGeek Tubes / Valves 6 9th March 2006 09:05 PM
6V6 vs EL84 SE UL AudioGeek Tubes / Valves 10 3rd February 2006 11:05 AM
What are the lowest distortion cone drivers available? JZatopa Multi-Way 7 7th September 2003 01:10 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2