|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Hello SY:
I have been doing more playing around with my sound card, getting some really decent results (far as I can tell). My latest quandary is testing the differences between two types of differential circuits. I am getting some results that are very similar to the post here in your article: His Master's Noise: A Thoroughly Modern Tube Phono Preamp And I thought you could shed some light on what I am getting. Background: the first page in the pdf is the partial schematic I am starting with (yes, the grids have a DC path to common). The other circuit I am comparing it to is identical, but removing the capacitor and placing a CCS under the cathodes, along with a 12V negative supply. Second page is the test with the resistor tail. No problems so far. Third page is a shot of the noise floor. Again, I'm fine with that - being that I have a rat's nest for a circuit, with the heaters not elevated, I'm not overly concerned with the 60/120 etc hum products. Clean that up later. Fourth page is where things get interesting. This is a test with the CCS in the tail. Harmonics are fine, but there is a lot of added noise as a result of the CCS above 3 kHz. Last page is the noise floor, with the same hash apparent. Curiously enough, these last two FFT's look quite similar to what you posted in your article. And that circuit was also using CCS's in various locations. I tried different CCS's, single and cascode, larger negative supplies, etc - but all with the same basic result. Is this behavior expected with the CCS? Thanks ! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I'm not sure I understand your circuit- did you draw it right? Double check and we'll see if there's anything odd that might make CCSes act funny.
In any event, the cascoded MOSFET CCS is ultra-quiet. Set up right, there should be no excess noise unless you have an oscillation.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
circuit looks fine -- the 2x 5K resistors and the 50K pot make a shunting volume control. I think he just didn't draw either resistors from each grid to ground, or more likely an input transformer with the CT to ground.
__________________
http://www.ecpaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
I was having trouble understanding the plate circuit- where is the power applied and is there really a cap between the transformer CT and the cathodes?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
__________________
http://www.ecpaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Well, if that's the case, there's a problem: there's insufficient voltage for the CCS to operate- it wants at least 10V or so across it.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
|
Sorry for the delay in getting back.
Yes, the 5K resistors and 50K pot are a shunt volume control. The actual signal circuit is a cross between the Raleigh audio and Raven circuit. For all intents, you can consider the first circuit under test to be a Raven fed with a phase splitting input transformer. The second circuit under test removes the cap from B+ to cathode, and replaces the resistor with a CCS. SY, I have used negative supplies for the CCS. -12V or -24V, no difference. I thought it was oscillation as well, but it looks identical to what you posted in the article....? Last edited by zigzagflux; 29th March 2011 at 04:07 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.ecpaudio.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
|
What's it look like with the cap removed and the resistor in place?
Can we look at the CCSs and see if you did something wrong there? |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Actually, I'm not sure of the cause of the noise in my spectra, but since it was ridiculously below audibility, I didn't chase it any further. You do have me curious... Nonetheless, the topologies are entirely different than yours so I wouldn't ascribe it to the CCS as a first guess. Did you look at the noise at the cathode junction? And what happens if you put the 15u cap back in while using the CCS?
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| His Master's Noise: A Thoroughly Modern Tube Phono Preamp | SY | diyAudio.com Articles | 123 | 26th October 2011 01:32 PM |
| Ping SY | JoshK | Tubes / Valves | 32 | 27th March 2009 12:12 PM |
| PING Sy re: quaternary ammonium salts | moray james | Planars & Exotics | 7 | 15th September 2005 04:48 AM |
| Ping SY | moray james | Planars & Exotics | 3 | 16th June 2005 04:39 PM |
| PING Sy Re Clysar | moray james | Planars & Exotics | 3 | 30th May 2005 07:03 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11542 seconds (80.26% PHP - 19.74% MySQL) with 11 queries |