|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Hey guys,
I need your help. I built a prototype power amplifier in the lab using KT88 tubes in push pull ultra-linear. I am having a hard time biasing the tubes since the the cathode current keeps drifting up or down. I have the HT voltage set to a regulated 500V so I am biasing at 50ma quiescent current. Sometimes I can get the bias currents matched but when I play some music and then check the bias currents again, they are different by more the 20ma sometimes. The tubes are Electro Harmonix KT88's and they are new (and supposedly matched), so I am wondering if this the reason. However, sometimes the bias can drift from 50mA to 80mA which is getting very close to the anode's maximum power rating. I am using an AnTek 70W toroidal output transformer wired for ultra-linear (I will eventually upgrade these to Edcor). What I find puzzling is that when the cathode currents are balanced, one tube's grid is at -57V (which is expected from the data sheet) and the other is around -48V. The bias supply is stable and regulated. Since these tubes are "matched" they should not be that different. If they are not matched, would there still be that big of a difference? Could I have a bad tube? I was powering the tube filaments using a switching DC power supply at 6.3V. The bias regulator schematic is attached as well as my amplifier schematic. The power amplifier design is by Bill Christie which I found in an AudioXpress magazine (Jan 08 issue) titled A Hybrid High Fidelity Amplifier. The design uses the LM4702 driver chip to provide enough voltage swing to drive the grids. I was not using any global feedback. Any ideas what could be the reason? The amp sounds quite good but when the bias currents get too far off there is some crossover distortion which is expected. Thanks |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
|
Though I'm not familiar with the front end at first glance the resistors (R28, R29, R35, & R36) in the bias circuit look too large Ohms-wise. 100K or so for R28 and R35 is more the norm. Not sure if this will help but it's worth a try.
Craig |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Charlotte,NC,USA
|
I would try a different bias trimpot for each tube, your balance circuit might be the problem.
Jam |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newark, DE
|
Absolutely. You need to have a path to ground from the grids. These tubes have large control grids which will accumulate unwanted electrons. They need a drain or the the tube will run away. GEC data sheets specify a maximum of 220k ohms for fixed bias applications where total dissipation is less than 35 watts.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'm a rank amateur so my two cents may not even be worth that. But I'm with JAM. Why would anyone want to use a single bias pot even with so called "matched" tubes? Also, Why would you want to use separate regulators in the same circuit? Is this a current limitation thing for the transistors? If the DC voltage varies even a little bit wouldn't that throw the bias off? And if so would you need a DC balance pot? Also, how much does your mains voltage vary? And if you have a single bias pot shouldn't you have a single cathode resistor? As always I have more questions than anything else. Hope I haven't embarrassed myself.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Newark, DE
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
The bias circuit itself uses two pots one sets the bias level and the other sets the balance between the two tubes. This is a perfectly good circuit and is similar to other circuits I have used. The resistor values need to be scaled so that the total resistance is under 100K from each grid to ground.
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South Florida
|
Quote:
__________________
Too much power is almost enough! Turn it up till it explodes - then back up just a little. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Thanks for the advice everybody. After reviewing the GEC datasheet I see that a maximum of 100k from grid to ground is needed. I will change the resistor values and give it another try.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melbourne, Oz
|
It's often worth putting some failure protection in to the pot R47 if the wiper goes open-circuit - perhaps by connecting the pot ends to the wiper by 470k or something similar. And also adding capacitive decoupling at the closest convenient point - ie. the wiper, or either arm of the wiper.
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Music Angel KT88 Bridged /Bias problem | kongarne | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 30th January 2009 01:57 PM |
| amplifier bias drifting | Craig405 | Solid State | 42 | 20th April 2008 06:00 PM |
| bias voltage vs bias current | woodturner-fran | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 24th February 2007 11:24 PM |
| The best bias point for KT88 | rossdt | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 27th July 2006 06:24 PM |
| KT88 Bias Adjustment | batinal | Tubes / Valves | 7 | 20th May 2006 05:16 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.12134 seconds (80.70% PHP - 19.30% MySQL) with 11 queries |