|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denmark
|
Why are the negative output terninals normally returned to ground in a NFB amplifier with output transformer?
I can understand why if feedback is used as the reference point is needed, but why ground a galvanically isolated output to ground point? Is there some performance issues? |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
If NFB is used from the secondary then a ground reference is necessary, as voltage always has to have a reference.
If no feedback is taken from the secondary then a ground is still helpful for safety reasons; it may reduce interference pickup too. |
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
Quote:
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lindau
|
Hi!
Each node in a good design has a defined potential. If the secondary is left floating it can build up an electrostatic charge from capacitive coupling between primary and secondary. Some transformers, especially high impedance transformers will have a wider bandwidth if the secondary is not grounded. In such a case connecting the negative end of the secondary through a resistor of a few KOhms will still avoid build up of electrostatic charge and minimze impact on bandwidth Best regards Thomas |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, crumbling wasteland
|
Quote:
There was a good 80 volts or so between the secondary and ground. Now I always ground them.
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denmark
|
Ok, thank you for all the good and relevant answers...
My secondaries will now be grounded! |
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Denmark
|
Quote:
This potential will, when system is interconnected be equilized between different parts via ground currents. There is quite some sonic difference between good and bad. Is the any way to determine the correct way? Normally I test with a voltmeter... I guess the difference is due to capacitive coupling between windings and chassis? |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
In DIY the chassis should always be grounded, either directly or via some safe arrangement to avoid a hum loop. There is plenty of discussion about this in other threads.
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Orlando, Florida
|
Quote:
Always ground the appropriate secondary terminal directly or indirectly (bandwidth consideration). |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Where to by outputs | mike49504 | Car Audio | 2 | 7th June 2010 05:17 AM |
| Balanced outputs used as inverting & Non-inverting preamplier outputs | gni | Solid State | 4 | 19th September 2008 03:25 AM |
| Lions and Tigers and Grounding Problems, Oh My! DoZ Grounding... | EchoWars | Solid State | 37 | 3rd August 2008 08:50 AM |
| LM3875 kit grounding, optimal grounding for separate amps and psu? | findog | Chip Amps | 9 | 16th May 2005 09:27 PM |
| Grounding SPDIF and Outputs to Chassis? | mfr | Digital Source | 1 | 25th May 2004 07:05 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |