|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
In this article
http://www.audioxpress.com/magsdirx/...rOddsEvRev.pdf I am trying to understand the transfer function graphs. Is he plotting the instantaneous DC grid voltage v.s. DC plate current? It is an interesting approach I think. It might also explain why in different amplifiers different folks have come up with differing "optimal" bias point for VA stages using the same preamp tube.
__________________
mike - www.keepingsundayspecial.org |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Indiana
|
Oh, BTW, in another article I read a claim that if the same tube is used with a CC followed by a CF using the same load and plate voltage that the distortion cancellation trick would also work in that case. I am not sure I understand how that could be since the degeneration in the CF should give it a different transfer function than the CC stage. Where am I getting off track?
Oh, Here it is... http://www.tubecad.com/articles_2001...ion/page3.html
__________________
mike - www.keepingsundayspecial.org Last edited by mashaffer; 22nd December 2010 at 05:43 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Well, it'd have been a lot easier if he had cared to label his axes ;-) Right now we can only guess.
My guess is that the horizontal axis represents the grid signal voltage (referenced to the bias voltage) and the vertical is plate current. Then again, the horizontal axis could be plate voltage referenced to the quiescent plate voltage... The gradient of the curve in Figure 1 indicates about 1600 ohm or 0.63 mS, which does not correspond to either Ri or S of the 300B?!? Kenneth
__________________
Never send a human to do a machine's job. --Agent Smith |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
When you balance off distortion against other distortion you are actually doing something not very different from negative feedback, except that NFB adjusts itself whereas manual balancing needs to be done manually. In both cases the result is a reduction in low order distortion and an increase in the relative effect of higher order distortion. The effect may depend on signal level.
He was talking about SE and evaluating valves on that basis. You need linearity for this. A push-pull amp can handle lots of even-order in the valves, as it cancels in the OPT. If you look at some of the popular PP valves they are not so good for SE. Finally, he accepts that some people prefer distortion and some amps deliberately include it. If only everyone could be that honest we might make more progress in audio! |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Making a dense nonresonant material | Few | Multi-Way | 36 | 7th December 2009 06:28 PM |
| The simplified schematic of J2 what I suppose to be. | wensan | Pass Labs | 9 | 16th November 2009 09:09 AM |
| Suppose I should have introduced myself first. | J_Starner | Introductions | 2 | 19th May 2006 01:41 PM |
| Heatsinking has now become less dense! | cunningham | Solid State | 5 | 9th November 2004 07:09 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.07383 seconds (78.98% PHP - 21.02% MySQL) with 10 queries |