|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Hi!
In a PP amp ( for example EL84) with unmatched tubes is it worth to use a trimmpot between the 2 tube's cathode resistor? Like in the attached picture. Would a 0.5W multiturn trimpot be enough?? Greets: Tyimo |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
|
I will say NO. Keep it simple.
With separate cathode resistors, the two tubes will be individually biased and should usually be equal within the limits of unbalance tolerated by the OPT. The cathode resistors must be bypassed though. Svein |
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Thanks Svein!
I just seen somewhere something like this. I don't know how much could be the differences between unmatched EL84s. Quote:
Greets: Tyimo |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
Then you can calculate the power dissipation of the 100 trimpot by well known formula P = IxI x R. So with 80 mA the power over 100 ohms trimpot is 0,64 W. Obviously you need to have a more powerfull trimpot or smaller, for example 47 ohms would do well. Then the power dissipation is only 0,3 W. The push-pull circuit is not very sensitive to small unbalance between the anode currents. However, it will improve your amplifier if you can balance the currents. But then you should also adjust the driving voltages for both tubes. Since it is obvious that if the quiescent currents are not equal, then the "sensitivity" is not equal too. But you need to have a distortion meter to achieve this "pink of perfection". |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Adding the trimpot in series reduces reliability, as 'slider off track' is a common failure mode. If you want to trim (but in my opnion it is not really necessary) put a larger value trimpot in parallel with the cathode resistors. Trimpot failure then reduces to the output being as balanced as it would be with no trimpot, rather than complete failure.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hungary
|
Thanks for everybody!!
Now I understand already! Maybe it would be easier to matching the tubes in the real circuit. Measuring the plate current draw under operating conditions, like measuring the voltage across the cathode resistor.etc. Greets: Tyimo Last edited by Tyimo; 5th December 2010 at 06:55 PM. |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mixed bias for balancing unmatched tubes in PPP? | athos56 | Tubes / Valves | 20 | 23rd October 2010 04:48 PM |
| 300B Cathode Feedback + Cathode Bias | korneluk | Tubes / Valves | 13 | 7th January 2009 08:07 PM |
| Stray hum pickup *preamp* cathode R-bias vs. battery bias & 12AU7vs.5687 | awedio | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 19th April 2008 01:30 AM |
| UL to triode mode conversion on cathode bias amp-different cathode resistors needed? | bigwill | Tubes / Valves | 6 | 30th December 2007 12:37 AM |
| Balancing PP output - which? | lgo51 | Tubes / Valves | 15 | 4th July 2002 03:35 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.08947 seconds (75.09% PHP - 24.91% MySQL) with 11 queries |