|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Alabama
|
Hey guys,
I am in the process of designing a SE 807 amp. In triode mode, I expect approximately 3.4W. I have already ordered Edcor GXSE15-8-5K OTs for this project. I wanted a low power amp for my newly-restored Klipsch Heresy speakers. However, my research tells me that the Heresy speakers vary their impedance from 10 ohms up to 70 ohms or so. Since transformers reflect the impedance of the secondary load to the primary, I can deduce that these speakers would NOT work well with a single-ended amplifier. Is this correct? If that's the case, how much of a difference would it make if I put a 15 ohm resistor on the outputs? That should keep the impedance within what I would consider an acceptable load. What will this resistor do to the frequency response, and do you think I'd notice an appreciable drop in volume? Thanks! Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
|
The 15 ohm resitor would certainly help and whilst it would take a bit of power it won't be noticable.
I'd be inclined to include the transformer secondary in the cathode circuit. If you have a cathode bypass cap then instead of connecting it to ground, connect it to the speaker output (with the other end to ground). you will need to experiment as to which way round one of the windings is connected (pri or sec). one way will give you lower gain and smoother respose, and the other will give more gain, and may even oscillate. |
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Alabama
|
I haven't really heard of putting the secondary in the cathode circuit before. That's definitely an interesting idea.
I got my info from here, and the general consensus was that the Heresy was not SE-friendly. http://community.klipsch.com/forums/p/77869/771253.aspx Also, many people say never to run a tube amp into no load, which is infinite impedance, technically. Since 70 ohms is much higher than 8 ohms, I would guess that it's not very good for it. That'd be reflecting 43.8KΩ into the primary, I believe. Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
The impedance of a typical speaker is relatively high at bass resonant frequency. Fortunately there is a cure for this. The proper amount of negative feedback. This reduces the negative effects of varying load impedance. Quote:
The worst results will exist with pentode-connected amplifier. With and without feedback. Best results exist with UL-connected amplifier and little worse with triode-connected. Also with and without feedback. Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Alabama
|
My current design is looking like either a 6SL7 single-ended front end or a 6SL7 SRPP, both possibly with an LED bias, just for fun. Right now I don't have any feedback (that I know of). If I did use negative feedback, what would I need to do and how would I calculate the values?
If the higher impedance really isn't a problem, then why do people say not to run a tube amp into no load? What will happen? I plan on having a switch to switch between UL and triode modes. I'm working on my schematic(s) right now, so we'll see how it goes. Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
A 15R resistor would waste 40% of your output power. Not a good idea.
Triode or UL should be OK. They will help damp the bass resonance. As you are going for SE I assume you don't want a low distortion design with global feedback. No load is a problem, especially at higher frequencies. A higher resistance is not a problem, especially at lower frequencies. If you want to use feedback then you either need to learn a bit more or copy an existing design, as feedback can create as many problems as it solves if not done carefully. Last edited by DF96; 3rd December 2010 at 08:15 PM. Reason: no load comment |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
The 70 ohm impedance will not be a problem. That is at a resonant frequency and obviously your amp will not make much power into that load.
But it won't have to, nor would you want it too, as if the amp made the same power, it would be *way* too pronounced at that frequency. If I were you, I'd give it a shot- certainly it will not be hard on the amp |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Alabama
|
Okay, great. I first have to get the amp built, and then get some tweeter diaphragms for the K-77s.
Thanks! Kyle |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Why i always have those losses in power using lower impedance loads? | destroyer X | Solid State | 12 | 5th June 2007 03:49 PM |
| Class D and Very Low Impedance loads | Bruno Putzeys | Class D | 30 | 3rd August 2005 08:38 AM |
| Driving Low Impedance Loads | weinstro | Solid State | 14 | 8th May 2005 09:53 PM |
| Zen driving high impedance loads | supa-roo | Pass Labs | 2 | 18th April 2003 07:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.11923 seconds (80.91% PHP - 19.09% MySQL) with 11 queries |