Linearity - Page 2 - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd December 2010, 05:38 PM   #11
diyAudio Member
 
smoking-amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
The triodes in those (6AF11, 6BD11) certainly have nice flat Mu curves, which is a good indication of linearity. 6AS11 is another pin compatible tube with the same triodes, but with a 6CX8 pentode included. Have heard good comments before from others on these triodes.

Depends also on how you are going to use them. A flat Mu curve should be good for a SE class A stage.

In P-P mode, class A, and a CCS tail, a different type of triode may work well. Here you want the sum of the gm's versus cathode current to sum to a constant. This can be approximated with tubes having a linear ramp of gm versus plate current. Take a look at the triode gm curves for the 6JN8 tube just posted on another thread (bottom of page 4):

http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/f...35/1/19JN8.pdf

Many other tubes have this weird triode curve set like 12AT7, 6LQ8, 6S4, 6LB8. You may have noticed a lot of positive comments for 12AT7 in P-P driver stages. The huge 2nd Harmonic that would show up in SE use cancels out in P-P, and the flat gm ramp largely knocks out the 3rd harmonic due to constant total gm.

As mentioned above, an analyzer, operating point, and tuning component values is the final arbiter. The datasheet curves are only a guide, and certainly not accurate enough to determine higher order distortions. A lot of data sheets seem to be "French curve" designs too. And then there is the significant variability between different "identical" tubes too. Leave some room for variability: auto bias or bias pots, gain balance pots, screen voltage adjust pots ...
__________________
Without MS, how would we live without all those hackers?

Last edited by smoking-amp; 3rd December 2010 at 05:47 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2010, 06:03 PM   #12
diyAudio Member
 
rsumperl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Warren Center, PA
The end goal of all this is to build a pre-amp to drive the red board. I have a turntable that has a magnetic catridge, so some form of amplification is necessary. So, given that these are dual triode, pentode tubes, how would you proceed signal wise, triode->triode->pentode?


Quote:
Originally Posted by smoking-amp View Post
The triodes in those (6AF11, 6BD11) certainly have nice flat Mu curves, which is a good indication of linearity. 6AS11 is another pin compatible tube with the same triodes, but with a 6CX8 pentode included. Have heard good comments before from others on these triodes.

Depends also on how you are going to use them. A flat Mu curve should be good for a SE class A stage.

In P-P mode, class A, and a CCS tail, a different type of triode may work well. Here you want the sum of the gm's versus cathode current to sum to a constant. This can be approximated with tubes having a linear ramp of gm versus plate current. Take a look at the triode gm curves for the 6JN8 tube just posted on another thread (bottom of page 4):

http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/f...35/1/19JN8.pdf

Many other tubes have this weird triode curve set like 12AT7, 6LQ8, 6S4, 6LB8. You may have noticed a lot of positive comments for 12AT7 in P-P driver stages. The huge 2nd Harmonic that would show up in SE use cancels out in P-P, and the flat gm ramp largely knocks out the 3rd harmonic due to constant total gm.

As mentioned above, an analyzer, operating point, and tuning component values is the final arbiter. The datasheet curves are only a guide, and certainly not accurate enough to determine higher order distortions. A lot of data sheets seem to be "French curve" designs too. And then there is the significant variability between different "identical" tubes too. Leave some room for variability: auto bias or bias pots, gain balance pots, screen voltage adjust pots ...
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2010, 06:50 PM   #13
diyAudio Member
 
smoking-amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
I haven't worked on any Phono preamps but Morgan Jones's book has a good section on this. I think the requirements on the 1st stage are quite stringent and conflicted. Low input capacitance, high gm, high gain, low noise, low microphonics, low Rp for a triode. A lot of preamps seem to end up with a JFET for the 1st stage. If it weren't for the noise, the pentode would be a good fit, and if it weren't for the low input capacitance req. and high Mu req. the pentode in triode mode would fit. (pentode Mu is around 25) Leaving, maybe triode section 1 with the current max'd out. Since section 1 is on the end and section 2 is in the middle, one might try upping the max Watts on section 1 to 2 W and dropping it on section two (in the middle) to 1 W. Keeping the pentode below the 5 W spec some also.

Note: the diagram on the GE data sheet does not show the sections visually in the same positions as they are mechanically. Check the pins on a real tube and you will see that section 1 is in the outside position.
__________________
Without MS, how would we live without all those hackers?

Last edited by smoking-amp; 3rd December 2010 at 07:06 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2010, 07:12 PM   #14
diyAudio Member
 
Wavebourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Send a message via Skype™ to Wavebourn
Here is the best MM phono corrector I've ever seen:

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
The Devil is not so terrible as his math model is!
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2010, 07:33 PM   #15
diyAudio Member
 
artosalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
After studying the data of both tubes, I prefer 6BD11 for phono amplifier.

Below is the result of quick (bias) calculations.

Click the image to open in full size.



Pentode section (as triode connected) is selected for 1st amplifier because it has highest gm and thus lowest noise. It is biased to relatively high anode current ( some 19 mA)

Triode 2 is selected for output stage due to it's lower Rp compared to Triode 1. Triode 1 is biased to 3,5 mA and Triode 2 to 6,0 mA respectively.
Triode 1 and 2 form a feedback amplifier and it's gain can be adjusted with feedback resistor (22k...27k in schematic). The total gain of the phono amplifier should be some 40...50 dB.

As can be seen the bias determining components are not standard sizes. The reason is that those are just calculated. The final values can be determined by optimizing the circuitry as a typical desing work.
  Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2010, 07:45 PM   #16
diyAudio Member
 
smoking-amp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
Since the 6AF11.. etc pentodes have such high gm (10,000), it might be worth considering a little trickery to get one into the 1st gain stage position. The pentode screen grid current can be bypassed to the plate using a small HV Mosfet or bipolar transistor.

Basically: Mosfet Source to the screen grid through a stopper resistor. Mosfet gate to a quiet screen voltage reference thru a 1K resistor. Zener, 15V, between source and gate for protection of the Mosfet at power up, and the Mosfet Drain to the plate. Now there is no screen partition noise (since it is recombined with the plate current, this might even lower microphonics some), and the low input capacitance of a pentode, with high gm. The 1st stage only has small signals on the plate, so it won't plunge below the screen voltage here.

You might want to consider something like a 6LY8 (20,000 gm pentode) plus 100 Mu triode, or other 9DX based tubes with a lower Mu triode if the pentode is "tricked" in for 1st base.

These are no doubt way outside the mainstream RIAA pre-amp design conventions.
-----------------------
edit: Ahh, I see Artosalo has gone with the triode'd pentode in 1st position. High gm rules for low noise.
__________________
Without MS, how would we live without all those hackers?

Last edited by smoking-amp; 3rd December 2010 at 07:52 PM.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Linearity of Helical Springs thadman Multi-Way 37 23rd September 2009 10:20 PM
small transistor linearity akis Solid State 2 16th July 2009 07:31 AM
Linearity maxpou Solid State 42 8th February 2008 11:44 PM
improve the linearity E007 Solid State 1 3rd May 2004 10:23 AM
Non-linearity of wattage to SPL... JoeBob Everything Else 5 21st February 2002 08:47 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 03:01 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2