|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Here is my new creation, a 807 push-pull amp, supposed to give 60W in AB2.
I added different plate to plate feedback resistors and measured the output of a 10kHz square wave, using a real speaker as the load of the amp. I used a real speaker so I could demonstrate the effect of the dampening factor Measurements could be repeated when I find the resistors to make a dummy load. (so i can calculate the real numbers..) Another thing to consider is that when I use smaller feedback resistors, the voltage on the input pentodes rises. Perhaps i should have increased the current in this stage to get the same voltages on every measurement. Here you will see the output of the 10k square, with no plate to plate feedback. Clearly, the amp doesnt have a good dampening factor. (altough I find it sounds rather nice already)
__________________
Real tubes have top-caps Last edited by hidnplayr; 23rd November 2010 at 12:37 PM. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Now, with plate to plate feedback.
From left to right: 56k, 82k, 150k
__________________
Real tubes have top-caps |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
180k, 200k, 220k
__________________
Real tubes have top-caps |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
|
Can someone explain to me what happens when I use a too small feedback resistor?
__________________
Real tubes have top-caps |
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eureka, CA
|
Quote:
What's happening is as the voltage drop across the resistors becomes less and less (as you decrease the resistance) there is very little remaning available driver headroom (voltage and current) to swing positive. Remember that the 807 plate voltage is decreasing as the driver voltage is increasing. It's running out of drive current. Try coupling your feedback with capacitors to block the DC current from the 807 plate. If that doesn't do it you may need more than 5-7 mA idle current in the driver instead. Or maybe the performance is great with the larger Rfb and you're golden! Cheers, Michael Last edited by Michael Koster; 23rd November 2010 at 02:39 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
With a small feedback resistor you are simply putting a square wave through a limited bandwidth, so it gets rounded off. This is what you should see at 10kHz. With a higher resistor you are seeing OPT ringing at its HF resonance, as the anode impedance is too high to damp the resonance. This looks superficially better, but is actually less accurate.
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Alps:Tube amp designs over 150W, SMPS guru.
|
I've tried this method on many power amps without real benefit. From a distortion view, each and everycase using good quality o/p transformers it made the 10 kHz sine distortion slightly worse, although it cleaned up the square wave ringing with the effect of reducing the already placed UL snubber values. In such cases, the application of global nfb (20dB) has such profound effects on the whole performance of the amplifiers that I dispensed with the configuration. I can only assume that the technique works best with lower quality output transformers, but one will find by altering the quiescent output stage current at 10kHz working this also has a profound effect on THD. i.e ye higher the quiescent current, the better looking squarewave and lower sine THD. Goes hand in hand. By tackling the 1st stage Zobel and the global feedback step response in a proper way I found I gives optimum results..........i.e nom 20dB circuit global nfb, the amplifier if designed properly should cope with another 15dB on top without any signs of oscillation or instability....into a resistive dummy load. It can be a tough test if the layout is poor. Alot of output stages, in my view run too light at higher audio frequencies which has a big effect on sound quality definition.
richy |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
R.I.P.
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Schaffhausen Switzerland
|
I have experimented with anode/anode fb many times, but no matter the improvements in measured performance, the amps always sound "thin".
No measurable bass roll off, but sound thin. Anyone else experienced this? Regards, Allen |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
|
Change in damping factor affecting bass resonance?
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
|
Quote:
Quote:
This can be seen as rounded edges of the square wave. I would suggest you to experiment with some amount of global feedback (...10 dB) from the secondary of the output transformer AND also this shunt feedback, but only a little (3dB...). You could find a great combination. By the way: You can get up to 70 W from an AB1-class PP-pair of 807. Makes the whole construction much easier... |
||
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| EL84 PP using 5K plate to plate primate OPT | jmillerdoc | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 9th March 2010 09:14 PM |
| Plate Current VS Plate Voltage Graphs | Captn Dave | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 13th February 2009 08:57 PM |
| ECC83 - Long Plate vs Short Plate | poynton | Tubes / Valves | 16 | 17th February 2008 07:42 AM |
| Subwoofer Plate Amplifier Base Plate supplier? | jwells777 | Parts | 1 | 11th May 2003 07:40 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |