|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Netherlands
|
I did find a recent patent (2007) here: Single Stage Balanced Voltage Amplifier - US 2007/0296492 A1 - IP.com
Any comments ? I like to try it with 6H30 or 6N6P, any suggestions for resistorvalues / B+ ? |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: London,UK
|
How on earth can someone be granted a patent for this?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
It hasn't been granted. It's an application.
__________________
“Listening to records is like ****ing a picture of Brigitte Bardot.” - Sergiu Celibidache |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
|
Piano,
When we talk patents we think someone has come up with something original, not done before. US patent system is a bit different; "patents" are often only used for commercial reasons, to prevent competitors from doing the same. Audio Note's interstage transformer in their dac's is an example here in Europe. When you investigate what it means most of the time the "patent" is valid in the US, or Europe, or just your own country. Patents which cover the whole world are the most expensive. Pieter |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
|
Why isn't output taken from the bottom of the CCS ?
Oh and I believe something similar (but with resistive load if I'm not mistaken) was posted here about 1 year ago, again a differental pair of triode cascodes.
__________________
mod verb, transitive /mod/ to state that one is utterly clueless about the operation of device to be "modded" and into "fixing" things that are not broken; "My new amplifier sounds great so I want to mod it." |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
|
Cut and paste out of a textbook. Nothing even clever about it. But since someone successfully re-patented the Darlington circuit with a tube in it, I guess the patent office doesn't expend much manpower on tube technology searches. Nice to have money to burn on such silly patents. This is probably just advertising-hype driven. If they don't have anything novel, they just fake it.
__________________
Ohms Law V = I R |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary, Ab, Canada
|
While the implementation I worked up some 15 years ago is singe-ended, a little study of that work and comparison with Fig. 2 in the patent app shows some real similarity in the f/b to the middle grid. I like mine better though ;-).
Here's the schematic http://www.pearl-hifi.com/06_Lit_Arc...scode_RIAA.pdf Bill @ PEARL |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Hickory, NC
|
Oh, the patent has the cascode grids ultralineared? I couldn't see that in the tiny picture in post #1. At least it has something more than a plain vanilla cascode then. Still, UL'ing a cascode has been around for a while, as Bill just demonstrated.
Another issue is that 3 tubes stacked up is simply impractical and dangerous, considering the high B+ required, and all those floating filament supplies required. Putting some Mosfets up top sides would make the thing more practical, but nothing new though. I seem to recall Janneman posted a Fluke HV calibration amplifier that used that setup.
__________________
Ohms Law V = I R Last edited by smoking-amp; 7th November 2010 at 12:16 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: SoCal
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Calgary, Ab, Canada
|
Hi:
Click the link in the first post to get the patent and no the grids in the first implementation are not "ultra-lineared", the thing is just a straight ahead, diff cascode with active plate loads. For something rather more interesting pull down this PDF http://www.pearl-hifi.com/06_Lit_Arc...n_a_Work_2.pdf and see page 24; some work a self-balancing diff stage that applied any common mode error to the "long tail" current source with the result that much higher and stable CMRR could be achieved over the life of the tubes. Bill @ PEARL |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| For Trade: Long Cardas Patented Binding Posts | Lewis Moon | Swap Meet | 3 | 30th September 2009 05:16 PM |
| FS: Cardas Patented Binding Posts CPBP-CRS | Monkey King | Swap Meet | 7 | 26th February 2009 03:45 AM |
| patented perpertual motion machines | 7n7is | The Lounge | 3 | 7th November 2007 05:07 PM |
| 6H6p cascode differential driving 2A3 PP | panos29 | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 21st May 2007 08:20 PM |
| Cardas patented binding post | Duck-Twacy | Multi-Way | 24 | 12th August 2003 05:19 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09853 seconds (79.86% PHP - 20.14% MySQL) with 11 queries |