Why wire an output transformer as autoformer ? (parafeed) - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th October 2010, 04:43 PM   #1
00940 is offline 00940  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
Default Why wire an output transformer as autoformer ? (parafeed)

The designer of the amp shown in this post: Parallel feed (choke load) in output stage uses the primary and the secondary of its output transformer in serie, to get an auto transformer rather than a classical transformer.

What's the point of it ? Any benefits doing so ? I felt curious about it and couldn't find any other exemples of this.

Thanks for any light on this.
__________________
Ben.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2010, 04:56 PM   #2
kevinkr is offline kevinkr  United States
diyAudio Moderator
 
kevinkr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Boston, Massachusetts
Blog Entries: 6
That's a very good question and given the ratios and the fact that this is a conventional parafeed OPT connected as an auto-transformer leaves me questioning this design choice.

Using a purpose designed auto transformer with these ratios would probably be little better. It in theory it should eliminate secondary windings, (but here it really doesn't) however the common (output) windings would be to have wire sized to match the required load current and would reflect a very small % of the overall winding electrical length - so again this leaves me wondering if there is any real benefit. Essentially at best you save a little small gauge inexpensive wire and IMHO that could be it.

It would very slightly increase the overall effective inductance of the "primary" and the transformation ratio for what I think would be an unmeasurable improvement in LF performance.

Low ratio devices are a big win due to better winding coupling due to the lower number of overall windings, (and you can save significant copper) but here it doesn't seem to make much sense.

I'm also wondering about lumped LC constant induced HF phase shifts when connected this way - and whether or not this might adversely affect the HF FR of the transformer.

I'm afraid I've added more questions, and answered none. In short I hope someone who has experimented with this topology given the ratios involved can state whether or not on purely technical grounds this is more than a design fashion statement.
__________________
"Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence." - Carl Sagan

Last edited by kevinkr; 14th October 2010 at 05:06 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2010, 04:58 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
Miles Prower's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: USA
Blog Entries: 6
Quote:
Originally Posted by 00940 View Post
What's the point of it ? Any benefits doing so ? I felt curious about it and couldn't find any other exemples of this. :confused
I've never seen anything like this done with hollow state, but you see it all the time in designs of wide-band, solid state, RF amps. That auto-transformer topology is frequently seen in "no tune" shortwave amps that can cover the 10M -- 180M ham bands without an LC tuner. Suspect its designer is a sand-head.

You can get away with that when using transistors since you can drive the impedances low enough so that stray and internal device capacitances have cutoff frequencies well below the 10M band.

Can't do that with hollow state, so you need to absorb those capacitances into an LC tuner or you lose all your gain.

Those %@#&^ no-tune SS amps are making good air variable capacitors virtually unobtanium these days.
__________________
There are no foxes in atheistholes
www.dolphin-hsl.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 14th October 2010, 07:25 PM   #4
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Tighter coupling? At least part of the 'primary' is perfectly coupled to the 'secondary' as they are the same piece of wire. However, the effect will be negligible for any transformer with a highish turns ratio. Fashion statement, more likely.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2010, 11:52 AM   #5
00940 is offline 00940  Belgium
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Paris
Thanks
__________________
Ben.
  Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2010, 05:05 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
the componets in that part of the schematic fit real well into a 35hz 6db high pass filter. the key element in the filter is the impedeance of the primary winding.

with out knowing th eimpedeance of the secondary winding, we do not know how the shift in impedeance effects the high pass filter. evidently, the extra impedeance was needed, to align the values for the compoents used. with out the use of the seconday widings impedeance, we are at 35hz high pass.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Electra-Print 5K:32 2.5W Parafeed Headphone Output Transformer dsavitsk Swap Meet 3 18th September 2010 06:03 AM
Advice on Parafeed Output Transformer Magz Tubes / Valves 3 16th June 2010 08:39 PM
Understanding how to wire up an Output Transformer newbambeeno Tubes / Valves 2 1st April 2010 06:26 PM
Power transformer as Parafeed output? Jeb-D. Tubes / Valves 57 7th August 2007 01:53 PM
5 wire output transformer navin Tubes / Valves 14 27th December 2005 10:45 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 07:56 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2