Distortion discussion from mosqueto Hybrid thread - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th September 2010, 03:55 AM   #1
TheGimp is offline TheGimp  United States
diyAudio Member
 
TheGimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
Default Distortion discussion from mosqueto Hybrid thread

Gentlemen (and any ladies present) please continue here:

I see several problems in this discussion.

First off we donít seem to be talking the same language or terms.

Iíll define a hypothetical scenario and hope we can go from there. Or just take off as you were but please keep it in this thread.

I design three amps. Iím a competent engineer or DIY hobbyist who understands tube theory and can read the tube specifications so I do a good job. I use the same tube in all three amps, and my output transformers are wonderful.

1. SE 6L6GB 6.25W at 10%thd

2. PP 6L6GB class a 12.5W at 2%thd

3. PP 6L6GB class AB1 25W at 2%thd

They are driving nearly identical speakers in that the frequency response, distortion, etc are identical, only the efficiency varies (by 3dB/WM) such that all three produce the same acoustic pressure levels with the same input signal.

Which has the lower distortion?

Which sounds better?

Why?


Personal ramble starts here so jump to the next post as you wish.

In the early 70s as I remember it, bigger was always better. Bigger engines, bigger amplifiers, bigger speakers, bigger everything. Then the gas shortage in 74 pushed people to start thinking (at least temporarily) about efficiency and power consumption.


Push pull amps were bigger (higher power output) and therefore they were better. They used less power for the same output as a SE amp (of which there were very few commercial versions) so from an efficiency standpoint they were better.

Distortion was reduced to a meaningless number by GNFB.

Stereo sales persons were told to crank up the volume to impress the customer, and mess with their hearing. (My room mate at Clemson University worked for one of the local up scale audio stores and had a lot of interesting stories to tell.)

Bose 901s are great because they take lots of power (no wrech imacon).

The fact is that PP amps naturally produce more odd harmonic distortion than SE amps. While the total THD (without GNFB) may or may not be less than a SE amp, the undesirable distortion is worse.

I believe the real reason big tube PP amps ruled the late 60s and early 70s was that most speaker efficiency was not that great. To get the loud levels that rock and later disco (remember that fad?) promoted, one needed lots of power.

Transistor amps were not necessarily better as much as they allowed music to be played louder. It was all driven by marketing and floor sales people.

Out of probably 30 friends at Clemson, I only know of one who had what would be today good speakers. That was my room mate Phil. He convinced me to get my first set of Heresy speakers and taught me a lot (what little I know) about stereo and sound reproduction.

I think I had the smallest amp of any of my friends (Sony STR5800SD 56wpc). But I had the most efficient speakers so I didn't care. I seriously doubt that any of them still have any of their stereo equipment. I still have both the Heresys and the Sony. Although the only reason I use the Sony now days is for it's phono input to play records into my computer to digitize them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2010, 04:18 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
sepolansky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Maryland
Which is lower distortion is an incomplete question and open to interpretation. To use your automotive analogy,m it's like asking which car is more efficient. The answer lies in the definition of efficiency. Is it miles per gallon? If the motor requires higher octane fuel, the answer needs a correction factor. Efficiency could also be horsepower per pound of fuel consumed, miles per passenger gallon (taking the advantage away from motorcycles and two-seaters). cost can even enter into the equation.

Back to audio, what is distortion? Just THD? How about a low frequency or high frequency rolloff? Not a "classic" definition, but it is a "distortion" of the original signal, if only part of the signal is played back. Ditto for low level information retrieval; if we don't reproduce all of the transients and hall sounds, etc., the sound is "distorted".

So when we quote distortion, any listening comparison will tell you, we are not measuring and reporting all of the distortions. How else to explain that a SE amp with 10% distortion is even listenable?

On your three amp comparison, I submit that the PP AB version is the lowest distortion. The amps have to be compared at a selected power level that all can achieve. So, 6.25 watts is the maximum comparison level. The SE amp will benefit in the comparison if a still lower level comparison is chosen.

I know it's crude, but I just check for visible clipping levels, crossover distortion and visible waveform distortions of other forms, then evaluate "distortion" with my ears.

Stuart
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2010, 04:26 AM   #3
TheGimp is offline TheGimp  United States
diyAudio Member
 
TheGimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
I purposely defined all three as driving different efficiency speakers so as to produce the same audio pressure levels at the same input drive voltage. Presume also that all three amps (including OPTs) have the same frequency response, phase margin, etc.

This is done so that we are not disadvantage one amp (SE) over another (PP) solely based on output level capability.

Therefore we are comparing all three at the same relative output, but not the same absolute output.

All three are compared at clipping for max distortion.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2010, 05:56 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
SpreadSpectrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
First let me say that I have never built an SE tube amp. However, I built a 50% cathode follower push-pull amp and as a result of compromises I made in the design of the last voltage amplifier stage I got some extra second harmonic distortion.

Many go on and on about how second harmonic is a euphonic distortion, but what many also overlook is that the non-linearity in the transfer function that produces the second harmonic distortion will also produce IMD when two or more tones mix (Hey, that occasionally happens in music). That will happen with any non-linearity in the transfer function. The best amp is the one with the straight transfer function. You just have to minimize overall distortion, make sure you aren't producing too much of the really nasty-sounding harmonics, ensure slew rates aren't limiting things, make sure transients get reproduced accurately, make frequency response flat, and reach your target damping factor, making trades as necessary. It's really quite simple.

By the way, my amp sounds awesome except when the singer makes an "s" or a "t" sound with any sort of musical accompaniment, then I cringe. Oh, well. Adjusting out the imbalance should be easy enough.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 1WdistchanB.jpg (236.7 KB, 257 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2010, 06:11 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
Wavebourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Send a message via Skype™ to Wavebourn
Here is very interesting point of view. The author has rich experience; he has own philosophy. However, I disagree with some of his conclusions, but it is interesting reading: The Amity, Raven, and Aurora
However, criticizing stalling of development of PP amps in 1950'th he himself builds amps that remind early 1930'th.
__________________
The Devil is not so terrible as his math model is!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2010, 06:43 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Sacramento
Hats off to you TheGimp.
Hello to the Rest,
Back in the good old days of working through school there was a company called Dynaco or Dynakit. I bought a Stereo 35 assembled by a tech at Aerojet. I also used a PAS 3. The speakers were JBL D130ís and 075 tweeters installed in homemade scoop horn cabs (JBL mailed the plans) made by me. I wish that I still had this stuff, it was all stolen. Yes it was about playing Led Zeppelinís Heart Breaker loud. In those days a SET (to me) was the low power console HiFi used by my grandfather.
These days it is playing with SET headphone amplifiers, Salasí RIAA JFET preamplifier and AudioTester 3.0.
Next will be Pete Millettís Engineerís PP amplifier and new to me JBL speakers. I have the 2225 woofers, 2123 mids and a replacement 075 tweeters. Grand Funk Railroad will rock again at my house.
AB PP to me is about more power per pound / dollar than better distortion. Yes the sonic signature is different but that is ok with me.
DT
All just for fun!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2010, 09:06 PM   #7
M Gregg is offline M Gregg  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
M Gregg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Hi,

The distortion will depend if the amps are working in class A or AB, I suppose you could argue that amps that run in Class A and have the ability to run AB will give more power (Watts).

I must admit many SET amps I have heard in HIFI shows do not seem to have the "drive" for some types of music. However I suppose it depends on the "Nut" you are trying to crack! I have heard Ongaku!

You could even argue that if an amp cannot reproduce the whole spectrum of frequencies "Bass comes to mind" within the music, it is distorting it!

Just for fun!

Regards
M. Gregg

Last edited by M Gregg; 11th September 2010 at 09:10 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th September 2010, 09:40 PM   #8
DF96 is offline DF96  England
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
My guess is that amp 3 will sound worse than amp 2, because it will have some crossover distortion. For the same 2% THD it is likely to have more higher-order distortion, which is generally agreed to sound worse than similar amounts of low-order distortion.

Which of amp 1 and amp 2 sounds best may be a matter of personal preference - it is clear that some people prefer their sound "warmed up" by 2nd order, which amp 1 will have. Those who prefer accuracy, or 3rd order, will prefer amp 2. To some extent it may depend on tastes in music too.

In all this I have assumed that no NFB is used, as this complicates the issue.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2010, 01:12 AM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Wavebourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Send a message via Skype™ to Wavebourn
I think the amp 1 should sound worse, 2 should sound better, 3 should be the best. Why? Because 6L6 tubes are optimal for P-P class AB amp.

Here are plate curves from RCA:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 6L6GC_P8.jpg (541.2 KB, 232 views)
__________________
The Devil is not so terrible as his math model is!
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2010, 02:04 AM   #10
TheGimp is offline TheGimp  United States
diyAudio Member
 
TheGimp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Johnson City, TN
But won't the SE output distortion be dominated by 2nd harmonic and other even harmonics, whereas the PP amp will cancel a good bit of the 2nd harmonic distortion.

Even though the PP has 1/5 the distortion of the SE, it should have a higher percentage of odd harmonics than the SE amp.

Based on that, it should sound worse.

No?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Getting more Distortion from a hybrid? skynyrdfan Solid State 1 13th June 2010 07:04 PM
Harmonic Distortion acoustic measurement discussion tresch Equipment & Tools 1 3rd September 2009 11:29 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:48 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2