300B filament winding center tapped? - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Tubes / Valves

Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 9th September 2010, 01:21 AM   #1
cjkpkg is offline cjkpkg  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Roswell GA
Default 300B filament winding center tapped?

Thinking about a 300B SE amp.

I am leaning towards the circuit John Broskie posted with the Aikido front end 12AX7 and 12AU7 and SS rectification for B+ and the driver heaters.

What would be considered the quietest method of handling the 300b filaments assuming they stay as A/C?
1. Find a transformer with a 5V CT winding?
2. Find a transformer with a 5V winding (5V-0) no CT?
3. Separate 5V xformer for the 300b's? (CT or non CT?)
4. Individual 5V xformers for the 300b's? (CT or non CT?)

I plan to reference the driver heaters to B+/4. I have not seen consistent methods of handing the heaters for the 300b's.

I am just a little confused over the whole CT versus non CT concept.

Thanks!

Last edited by cjkpkg; 9th September 2010 at 01:43 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010, 01:58 AM   #2
BZed is offline BZed  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
By using a center tap transformer winding and using the CT as the reference for the cathode the average hum voltage will be 0. As one end of the cathode/heater is + the other end will be - compaired to the reference. I would use a seperate transformer for each 300b tube.



BZ

Last edited by BZed; 9th September 2010 at 02:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010, 03:45 AM   #3
tomchr is offline tomchr  United States
diyAudio Member
 
tomchr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Seattle Area
For no hum induced by the 300B filament, ground one end of the filament and use a 5.0 V DC supply for it. DC heating of a directly heated triode is as quiet as it gets.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th September 2010, 11:57 AM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Hello,

In my 300B SE amp, The 300B are heat on 5VDC (rect.bridge + RC filtering) symmetrically balanced to ground. No CT on the Xfo, which is a 6.3VAC winding.

A+!
__________________
if it works, don't fix it !
si cela fonctionne, ne touchez rien !
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2010, 06:48 AM   #5
BZed is offline BZed  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
In general for directly heated cathode tubes like the 300b DC filiment voltage can cause asymetrical electron emission from cathode due to the difference in cathode to grid bias from one end of the filiment/cathode to the other. That is one reason I would use AC filiment voltage, longer tube life. The other reason is that when rectifying to get the DC voltage you get high current spikes in the diodes. The noise caused by these spikes can cause a buzzing sound that can get into the gourding system and is very hard to get out of the system.

I just think that using DC filiments is more trouble than its worth. Correctly done AC will perform just as well, is simpler to do and the tubes will last longer.



BZ
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2010, 11:05 AM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Hi BZed,

My experimentations about AC heating of 300B, 50, 45, 10Y, 211, 845, 814 all showed that it was impossible to have no AC hum in the speakers, even when "correcty done" (short and balanced lenght of the wires, quality pot wirewound or molded carbon AB, etc...).

With my DC balanced non-regulated (RC filtered) heating, I have no hum (AC or spikes) in the speaker even with the ear on the diaphragm (98dB 15" woofer in a 232L bass-reflex), and nothing appears on the scope (less than 0,3mV visible ripple, which can be due to the measurement cables...) at the speaker output.

So you may have been more lucky than me in your AC heating experimentations, then...

A+!
__________________
if it works, don't fix it !
si cela fonctionne, ne touchez rien !
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th September 2010, 01:36 PM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
zigzagflux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
If going SE, I think your best bet would be separate, dedicated, shielded 5V transformers for each triode, and using a resistor / hum pot arrangement to null the 60Hz. It will not be possible to remove the residual 120Hz hum with the nulling procedure, though there are some more advanced and fancy methods of using injection or cancellation of the ripple voltage. No matter what you do, there will be a small amount that gets through.

You may find yourself more satisfied with a robust DC heating design. Ultimately it may prove simpler with better results.

PP is another story; you can get pretty respectable low hum with DHT's.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Filament winding wire diameter Klimon Tubes / Valves 6 29th March 2010 07:56 PM
Raising filament winding above cathode with a EZ81 in the circuit OK? G Tubes / Valves 3 15th May 2008 08:29 PM
Taking a Hammond 369BX filament winding to the limit? G Tubes / Valves 3 15th January 2008 04:25 PM
Grounding the Filament Winding alexmoose Tubes / Valves 14 8th June 2006 03:39 PM
Help with lowering filament winding voltage. G Tubes / Valves 7 8th September 2003 11:36 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:19 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2