|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Hi! Anyone have schematic for passive volume control with loudness compensation and 250-500K potentiometer without taps? Tapped pots are very problematic to obtain today unless ordered in quantity 100+ directly from factory.
I found schematic on Steve Bench web site (attached to this post), but I have no idea of its origin. In the books I have there are schematics, but ALL use tapped potentiometers. Thanks in advance for any suggestion(s). |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Anyone ?
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Wellington
|
Something like this?
Reverse of the old Loudness Control Also check the latest posts in that thread, starting with this one: Reverse of the old Loudness Control ... but I haven't seen a way to do it passively. If there was, it would have been done that way from the beginning to avoid the extra cost of tapped pots. Last edited by Don Hills; 5th September 2010 at 11:35 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
|
I have this one, slightly simpler - I also cannot tell you its origin: (when I saw the useful circuit I just saved it with no record of where it came from)
It should be easy enough - using simulation software - to plot the frequency response curves of both circuits and see which you prefer. The tapped pot circuits are merely a cheap approximation anyway, so no reason they are inherently better than an arrangement using a standard pot, other than they may give a lower insertion loss. There are also circuits that use double-gang pots, so for stereo you'd need a four-gang, or two gear-coupled twin-gangs.
__________________
Steerpike's Toybox Last edited by Steerpike; 5th September 2010 at 01:25 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
You can place a parallel RC in series with the cold end of the pot to ground, place a switch across it if you want to be able to defeat it.
Some iteration is required (With 100K pot I might start with 4.7K - 10K and 0.1uF or greater and iterate from there to the optimal values - best done in spice) and this approach works best over a very limited range of the listening levels, and as you would expect boost becomes significantly less as you turn the volume up.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net Last edited by kevinkr; 5th September 2010 at 03:22 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
|
Seems like passive circuit is not the best solution. May be someone can suggest active one with 12AX7 or6N1P for example (I have them anyway already)?
|
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Tone Control with Loudness ? | thoronx | Solid State | 43 | 2nd March 2011 04:26 AM |
| Reverse of the old Loudness Control | jamikl | Solid State | 83 | 7th September 2010 01:08 AM |
| Loudness Control Calc - Help Please | LinuksGuru | Tubes / Valves | 0 | 14th December 2008 03:43 PM |
| Looking for info on loudness control | normanjr | Tubes / Valves | 5 | 26th September 2006 04:43 PM |
| loudness control | maylar | Solid State | 6 | 28th March 2004 04:12 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.09574 seconds (73.46% PHP - 26.54% MySQL) with 11 queries |