|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Tubes / Valves All about our sweet vacuum tubes :) Threads about Musical Instrument Amps of all kinds should be in the Instruments & Amps forum |
| diyAudio Sponsor | ||
|
|
||
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx, USA
|
Curious what the correct balance arrangement should be.
Here's how things are set up 1. Push Pull DHT finals using a shared (center tapped) filament transformer 2. Cathode bias (resistor) connected between center tap and ground 3. A/C heated filaments Thanks
__________________
"Any fool can know. The point is to understand" - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Moderator
|
No provisions for balancing are possible with the set up you have described above, you must use fairly well matched tubes in this instance.
__________________
www.kta-hifi.net |
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx, USA
|
Thanks.
What's the right way to do this, then. Separate filament transformers ? FWIW, I do have an interstage transformer splitting phase with dual secondaries (currently tied together at ground potential). I could use fixed grid bias if that would help, though there's still the complication of measuring individual tube bias.
__________________
"Any fool can know. The point is to understand" - Albert Einstein |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ball Ground, GA
|
One method I have used successfully to balance push-pull DHTs is to employ a Williamson style bias balance/bias adjustment arrangement, along with small 1 ohm current sampling resistors in the pate leads. Alternatively, I have used the same arrangement without the plate resistors, but with output transformers that featured separate B+ leads for each plate winding. This made it easy to switch a small ma meter in series with each B+ lead to measure current flow. The Heath WM-6 is but one example of amplifiers employing the latter approach's technique. Either of these methods will allow balancing while only needing one filament transformer for the two tubes.
Dave Last edited by dcgillespie; 3rd September 2010 at 01:13 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
The only desperate way to do this would be take adv. of the fact that the DHT grids
are at 0 volts at idle (since you are using a cathode bias resistor and common filament transformer). You could then apply a small, additive DC input at each grid - using a potentiometer and resistor network. You could use a 9V battery, as that's as much trim as you'd need. Again, this is desperate, because obviously each DHT has a different transconductance, so the moment AC signal is applied to the grids, there'd be AC assymetry about 0V as well as an "error" AC signal at the cathode bias resistors.... Only for idealistically matched pairs, would there be a pure DC voltage at the cathode R and no AC signal at all... If you go read some of Lynn Olson's stuff, this induced error voltage at the shared cathode can actually be dealt with through the "WE Bypass" topology. (See Lynn Olson's Amity amp) Most PP transformers are gapped to handle DC imbalances as you describe and perhaps the solution to your problem is to try the WE bypass capacitor approach, or, need be, get an output transformer that can take some idle imbalance current, and - as someone else mentioned - try to find tubes more closely matched in gm. -- Jim |
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Medford, MA
|
Read this!
Find the section (and schematic) related to the enclosed quotation from Lynn.. Western Electric - Rosetta Stone for Triodes Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dallas
|
Matched and bypassed CCS in the plate circuits?
Any drop in plate voltage same as 1/Mu drop in grid bias. To spare such a drop, needs higher B+ voltage to start with... |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Eskilstuna, Sweden
|
Something like this might be a solution as long as we stay in class-A. Wouldn´t say this one is optimal, just a concept.
__________________
Brgds Lars |
|
|
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
|
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| An all DHT push pull amp. | Eusebius | Tubes / Valves | 3 | 28th October 2006 12:37 PM |
| Push Pull DHT triode | James D. | Tubes / Valves | 14 | 8th April 2004 03:43 PM |
| a tiny, all DHT, push-pull amp | Joel | Tubes / Valves | 12 | 28th March 2003 06:04 PM |
| Push pull dht triode with diode bias | James D. | Tubes / Valves | 24 | 5th January 2003 08:19 AM |
| DHT triode push pull amplifier design | James D. | Tubes / Valves | 2 | 5th December 2002 08:44 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.10546 seconds (74.29% PHP - 25.71% MySQL) with 11 queries |